301 as buffer site or Contextual web2.0 ?

Which is better ?

301 as buffer site means , we do short url like bit.ly to our page which we want to rank ? then build backlinks through them ?

OR

We make some web2.0 and build backlinks to them ?

301 sounds like a great idea, but as some of the guys here who use this method all the time will likely tell you - they seem to have a tolerance level to inbound links - above which they either fail, or don't pass on the juice you would expect.
So in a low comp niche this might be a decent idea if you accept the limitations.
Otherwise the WEB2 seems better( Mix it up - not just web2 though - high authority content sites of all kinds)

Scritty

Well i have seen people buy a domain usually which contains their keyword and they usually put a lot of blog comments or profile links to it and then simply 301 to their money site.. I wonder how safe it is

RockstarSEO said:

Well i have seen people buy a domain usually which contains their keyword and they usually put a lot of blog comments or profile links to it and then simply 301 to their money site.. I wonder how safe it is

Click to expand...

Not very What I have found better is buy old domain, build site with plenty of content, then Redirect the site.

What mickyfu said, or..


301 domain to web 2.0 which links to your money site.