250+ Web2.0 or Gsa dripfeed blast to moneysite?

ErinBoMan

Newbie
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
36
Reaction score
7
I am in a double mind whether to go for a service offering Web2.0 about 250 plus to money site or to go for a Gsa SER blast with 20k links to money site drip fed
Site is not new

With GSA i suppose there is a risk of burninbg the site sooner or later.

Whats ur opinion
 
Build like 20 manual ******** tier 1 parasites and blast it with the fiverr gig on a tier 2 if you must.
 
Go for 250 webs 2.0 in drip feed mode !!

Posted via Topify on Android
 
On my main authority sites I actually go...
Moneysite>
Web2.0/parasites (all original hand written content)>
More Web 2.0/parasites (good spun content based on my own original content)>
I then blast the shit out of the last tier using GSA and Scrapebox

You probably don't have to go as far as I do but I am paranoid about my main site getting penalised which is why I keep all spammy blasts a few tiers away but on a new niche I am testing, I am removing the last tier and spamming straight to my 1st tier of web 2.0s/parasites. It's only a small niche so I'm not bothered if I do get spanked.
 
When you say Web 2.0/parasites are you thinking of tumblr, imgur, etc.? I tend to think of those as Web 2.0 and parasites as Amazon, FB, and other megasites. Just want to clarify.

Also, are you saying 2 layers of Web 2.0? Question - if, for example, tier 1 has 10 sites pointing to the money site, how many sites are in tier 2 pointing to tier 1?
 
When you say Web 2.0/parasites are you thinking of tumblr, imgur, etc.? I tend to think of those as Web 2.0 and parasites as Amazon, FB, and other megasites. Just want to clarify.

Also, are you saying 2 layers of Web 2.0? Question - if, for example, tier 1 has 10 sites pointing to the money site, how many sites are in tier 2 pointing to tier 1?

Parasites: I consider parasites to be Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn and soup.io and I occasionally use Amazon (as I hastily wrote a small ebook for my niche so I could use a product page legit) and I know there are more but these are the only ones I use.

Web2.0: I only use Wordpress, Typepad, Jimdo, about.me, webs.com and blog.com - I never use blogger.

This is how I do it (not saying it's perfect but it works for me)...

I create 6-10 web2.0's/parasite pages to my money site. Some of these I have had for a couple of years but there are a few that I have only created in the last few months. I use different identities and different email addresses (and I use HMA - hide my ass) whenever I create these identities. I always do an about us page and each one has a couple of posts BUT I always link out to authority sites as well such as newspapers and other media sites.

I then create 2 web2.0s/parasites to each web property in tier 1, again using different web identities and do the same process as above.

I then use GSA to send links to these tier 2 properties BUT on my latest run, I only sent links to a couple of the tier 2's but also tried a Magic Submitter campaign aimed at the rest of these tier 2's.

My rankings are pretty good - I'm in the top 3 for my main keyword which gets about 20,000 searches a month. It may not seem a lot but the income for this type of business is very lucrative. I should also point out that my main money site was launched in February 2008 and has almost 3,000 pages indexed in G.
 
Parasites: I consider parasites to be Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn and soup.io and I occasionally use Amazon (as I hastily wrote a small ebook for my niche so I could use a product page legit) and I know there are more but these are the only ones I use.

Web2.0: I only use Wordpress, Typepad, Jimdo, about.me, webs.com and blog.com - I never use blogger.

This is how I do it (not saying it's perfect but it works for me)...

I create 6-10 web2.0's/parasite pages to my money site. Some of these I have had for a couple of years but there are a few that I have only created in the last few months. I use different identities and different email addresses (and I use HMA - hide my ass) whenever I create these identities. I always do an about us page and each one has a couple of posts BUT I always link out to authority sites as well such as newspapers and other media sites.

I then create 2 web2.0s/parasites to each web property in tier 1, again using different web identities and do the same process as above.

I then use GSA to send links to these tier 2 properties BUT on my latest run, I only sent links to a couple of the tier 2's but also tried a Magic Submitter campaign aimed at the rest of these tier 2's.

My rankings are pretty good - I'm in the top 3 for my main keyword which gets about 20,000 searches a month. It may not seem a lot but the income for this type of business is very lucrative. I should also point out that my main money site was launched in February 2008 and has almost 3,000 pages indexed in G.

Sorry to interrupt your thread flow. I have few questions if you don't mind.

1) How many links you build for your tier-2 parasites and web 2.0. W
2) then you build parasites for tier 2 most of them I know are nofollow. so keeping parasite in tier2 may not let the link juice flowing in(just my view). I might be wrong here. Do you have any list of parasites that are d0f0ll0w?


thanks
 
Thats great explanation, quite thorough.
I am doing plain simple

Money Site < Web 2.0 < GSA Blast + Social Signal

Parasites: I consider parasites to be Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn and soup.io and I occasionally use Amazon (as I hastily wrote a small ebook for my niche so I could use a product page legit) and I know there are more but these are the only ones I use.

Web2.0: I only use Wordpress, Typepad, Jimdo, about.me, webs.com and blog.com - I never use blogger.

This is how I do it (not saying it's perfect but it works for me)...

I create 6-10 web2.0's/parasite pages to my money site. Some of these I have had for a couple of years but there are a few that I have only created in the last few months. I use different identities and different email addresses (and I use HMA - hide my ass) whenever I create these identities. I always do an about us page and each one has a couple of posts BUT I always link out to authority sites as well such as newspapers and other media sites.

I then create 2 web2.0s/parasites to each web property in tier 1, again using different web identities and do the same process as above.

I then use GSA to send links to these tier 2 properties BUT on my latest run, I only sent links to a couple of the tier 2's but also tried a Magic Submitter campaign aimed at the rest of these tier 2's.

My rankings are pretty good - I'm in the top 3 for my main keyword which gets about 20,000 searches a month. It may not seem a lot but the income for this type of business is very lucrative. I should also point out that my main money site was launched in February 2008 and has almost 3,000 pages indexed in G.
 
do daily 15 manually link building of web 2.0 this is better for you
 
Neither for a new site, build manual links as tier 1 as suggested above, then power them up further with tier 2s.
 
Thanks hmeister. That's helpful. I like the idea of soup.io - I haven't used it before. Do you ever use tumblr or imgur or twitter or some of the other prominent web 2.0 sites?
 
You said you occassionally use Amazon as a parasite, but how do you get it to link out? Or am I missing your point?

Sorry to interrupt your thread flow. I have few questions if you don't mind.

1) How many links you build for your tier-2 parasites and web 2.0. W
2) then you build parasites for tier 2 most of them I know are nofollow. so keeping parasite in tier2 may not let the link juice flowing in(just my view). I might be wrong here. Do you have any list of parasites that are d0f0ll0w?


thanks
 
Personally, I would create Web 2.0 pages in less popular (but still authoritative) sites. I've seen better results with that strategy, probably because Google has inflicted some sort of manual penalty on the most authoritative sites. The reason could be something else entirely, though.

Anyway, assuming you create a fair amount of Web 2.0, you don't need to spam each one that much and sites with (a bit) less authority can still take a lot of links. I never go past 10-15k per Web 2.0 page.
 
Back
Top