2016 SEO Basic to Advanced

New ideas to rank sites are always welcome, but what they lack the most is always data to back up their claims.

I would stick with what i am doing to be honest, more than 20 sites of mine ranked with d0f0llow links say otherwise :).
 
is sent this thread to josh for his comment. this was his response:

Hey eldran

I never said links don't count anymore at all

I said d0 f0ll0w links IMO are a greatly reduced signal , being replaced over time by user actions tracked by rankbrain - i think Rand and Limbocher have proven that fairly conclusively

and they [google] are tracking more than just d0 f0ll0ws - i am ranking sites (and i have colleagues rankings sites) using nofollows and straight text mentions (and offsite reviews and ratings, which are much safer to get - which you saw in my 2015 video

so, can you rank with links? yeah, of course! IF you also have quality (because then rankbrain will flush you down the toilet anyways)

are d0 f0ll0ws the only or best or most important signal?

No. the data says no.

at least not in the sites i am seeing, or the leaks i am getting from googlers (yes i still know and talk to them)

but i do mostly white hat shit

and yeah, i so SEO for a living, so yeah i am going to push my services

but consider that means i need to have to be RIGHT (most of the time) in my SEO theories, or my clients would leave, and my fans would not rank

my clients and fans do rank - time and again they come back and thank me for my free advice and cite me as the reason why they are ranking

i have to make sure my SEO theories are mostly accurate or i don't sleep at night because i have no clients anymore and or a guilty conscience bc i advised them wrong (you know about my ethics background - i am one of those assholes with a conscience)

also, notice that it is often people who sell d0 f0ll0ws who say they are still the biggest factor... or people who just don't like change

so you can put that on the forum if you like - my only concern is that i know young people are on BHW often and are trying to make money and i feel bad they are still getting ye olde black hat advice from 2008 from people who just want to sell them links, and or are just haters and hate anything i say or any new algo to exploit

---

so there is his response

{editted by me bc BHW ws erplacing some of his words "d0 f0ll0w"}

I think that's fair enough, its been a few years since I tried to argue that d0 follow and n0 follow had lost the majority of its meaning as I had a site that was doing well and the majority of its links were n0 follow.

also look to local seo and you will see what he saying about mentions, citations etc etc.
 
I think the definition of a "link" needs to change now.

A lot of you guys are considering "links" to be d0follow ahref="..., when in fact as soon as the Knowledge Graph was introduced, links are simply links between entities, and the relationships between them.

This means that a "link", in the new sense, can be a review (positive or negative), a url mention, a Twitter tweet @ an account, a Youtube video about a brand, as well as all the traditional links.

So "links" will always be the most important factor, as they are simply connections between things, which is how anything is determined.
 
In general terms, auditing is a systematic examination of an event, a result, a concept, or financial books in order to make smarter decisions
 
Backlink is just like your your neighbour know your name... Get famous...
 
Backbone of seo is backlinks it will never ever die.
 
Back
Top