2014 New Instagram iMacros Likes + Comments

Well thank you :)

Just another question, do you think making the delays of the comments more random (still in the same range) would allow me to use the macros 24/7?

If not, what do you suggest I do to allow the comment macros to run 24/7? I'm assuming that the like macros are able to run for long periods of time how they are now, yes?
 
Well thank you :)

You're welcome again :)

Just another question, do you think making the delays of the comments more random (still in the same range) would allow me to use the macros 24/7?

Nope.

If not, what do you suggest I do to allow the comment macros to run 24/7?

Put a large delay between comments, if the delay is too short, you're going to be blocked from comments a few hours.

I'm assuming that the like macros are able to run for long periods of time how they are now, yes?

Yes sir.

As I said in the first post, I think Instagram will detect it if you comment the same things, even at random delay, there's the usual limit of 60 comments per hour, but Instagram's algorithm include some other things like how old is your account, etc, so we can't be sure or do math that's more random, but to help a little bit there's this macro

Code:
[FONT=Helvetica Neue UltraLight]SET !VAR5 NULL
[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica Neue UltraLight]SET !VAR5 EVAL("var randomNumber=Math.floor(Math.random()*60); randomNumber;")[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica Neue UltraLight]WAIT SECONDS={{!VAR5}}[/FONT]

Which will basically pick a random number between 1 and 60 as a time to wait between whatever you're doing (likes, comments, follow)
 
Last edited:
You're welcome again :)



Nope.



Put a large delay between comments, if the delay is too short, you're going to be blocked from comments a few hours.



Yes sir.

As I said in the first post, I think Instagram will detect it if you comment the same things, even at random delay, there's the usual limit of 60 comments per hour, but Instagram's algorithm include some other things like how old is your account, etc, so we can't be sure or do math that's more random, but to help a little bit there's this macro

Code:
[FONT=Helvetica Neue UltraLight]SET !VAR5 NULL
[/FONT][FONT=Helvetica Neue UltraLight]SET !VAR5 EVAL("var randomNumber=Math.floor(Math.random()*60); randomNumber;")[/FONT]
[FONT=Helvetica Neue UltraLight]WAIT SECONDS={{!VAR5}}[/FONT]

Which will basically pick a random number between 1 and 60 as a time to wait between whatever you're doing (likes, comments, follow)

Wow thank you so much for such a detailed answer! I like your idea of randomizing the time between 1 second and 60 seconds but that would cause a ban even faster since before it would be every minute but now it's less. You said if I want to run 24/7 that a higher delay would work. How about 2-3 minutes? Too low still? If you think that's a good time, do you think you could please change the timing in that new code you gave me to 2-3 minutes randomly? And also, im assuming I change all the 60 second waits to that one. Either way thank you so much! You are so helpful! :)
 
Last edited:
Wow thank you so much for such a detailed answer! I like your idea of randomizing the time between 1 second and 60 seconds but that would cause a ban even faster since before it would be every minute but now it's less. You said if I want to run 24/7 that a higher delay would work. How about 2-3 minutes? Too low still? If you think that's a good time, do you think you could please change the timing in that new code you gave me to 2-3 minutes randomly? And also, im assuming I change all the 60 second waits to that one. Either way thank you so much! You are so helpful! :)

I can't really say if 2-3 minutes is good or not because I don't have the time to comment anymore but you can test it by yourself and post your feedback, in the previous macro, replace

Code:
60

By

Code:
180 + 60

This way it'll wait between 1-3 minutes, if it's too low you just have to change the 180 to a higher amount of seconds.
 
I can't really say if 2-3 minutes is good or not because I don't have the time to comment anymore but you can test it by yourself and post your feedback, in the previous macro, replace

Code:
60

By

Code:
180 + 60

This way it'll wait between 1-3 minutes, if it's too low you just have to change the 180 to a higher amount of seconds.

can I just make it 180+120 so it's 2-3 minutes? I don't really understand iMacros sorry lol
 
Thank you very much for all the imacroses
 
Last edited:
Is anyone else having issues with Websta or is it just me? I'll search a hashtag, then click on the hashtag link to pull up all the pictures for that hashtag. The next page will then be fully loaded for about 2 seconds then do another refresh and then never load, leaving a blank screen (maybe with a banner ad but that's it). Anyone else experiencing this or have any possible explanations for this? Is it possible they've picked up on me using an iMacro on their site?
 
Is anyone else having issues with Websta or is it just me? I'll search a hashtag, then click on the hashtag link to pull up all the pictures for that hashtag. The next page will then be fully loaded for about 2 seconds then do another refresh and then never load, leaving a blank screen (maybe with a banner ad but that's it). Anyone else experiencing this or have any possible explanations for this? Is it possible they've picked up on me using an iMacro on their site?

Try with another browser, I just checked 5 pages and Websta loaded 20 pictures for each of them. Sounds like you need to clean your cookies.
 
Yep, go to someone's followers page, and use this:

​
Code:
SET !ERRORIGNORE YESSET !EXTRACT_TEST_POPUP NO
SET !TIMEOUT_STEP 2
TAB T=1
TAG POS={{!LOOP}} TYPE=A ATTR=CLASS:profimg&&HREF:/n/* EXTRACT=HREF
TAB OPEN
TAB T=2
URL GOTO={{!EXTRACT}}
WAIT SECONDS=2
TAG POS=1 TYPE=BUTTON ATTR=TXT:Follow
WAIT SECONDS=2
TAB CLOSE
SET !VAR5 NULL
SET !VAR5 EVAL("var randomNumber=Math.floor(Math.random()*56); randomNumber;")
WAIT SECONDS={{!VAR5}}

I got this error:
SyntaxError: wrong format of SET command, line 1 (Error code: -910)
 
Just started running it on 5 accounts last night using SandBoxie and so far it's been running with no issues, except I get the error "Instagram API does not respond. Please try again" quite often when I'm commenting. In 3 pictures, around 1 of them gets this message. I'm using webstagram and I'm just wondering if switching to your followgram iMacros will solve this issue?

Also, when using like macros, webstagram doesn't show the most recent pictures, it just keeps showing the same ones even though more pictures are being posted. And no, it's not because of the "earlier" part of the script since I got rid of it. I would use Followgram but its really fucked up and won't let me verify my email so I'm wondering if there's a fix to this.
 
Last edited:
Just started running it on 5 accounts last night using SandBoxie and so far it's been running with no issues, except I get the error "Instagram API does not respond. Please try again" quite often when I'm commenting. In 3 pictures, around 1 of them gets this message. I'm using webstagram and I'm just wondering if switching to your followgram iMacros will solve this issue?

As you say yourself "Instagram API does not respond. Please try again" means that the problem it's between Instagram and Webstagram, so us, end users unfortunately can't do anything about it and just wait to be fixed. But that's still curious since you are the only one reporting this issue, how often does it happen? I once read that botting with one IP is good for 3 accounts but not above after that Instagram's algorithm will flag you. Why don't you try directly with Followgram? Or within the Instagram App? And see what's the difference?


Also, when using like macros, webstagram doesn't show the most recent pictures, it just keeps showing the same ones even though more pictures are being posted. And no, it's not because of the "earlier" part of the script since I got rid of it. I would use Followgram but its really fucked up and won't let me verify my email so I'm wondering if there's a fix to this.


I'm sorry to tell you, but you're wrong, Webstagram does shows the most recent pictures, I just did a simple test, I searched the hashtag "girl" in Webstagram, and with the App at the same time, they both found the exact same amounts of pictures and both showed the same ones. So I'm guessing the hashtag that you're using doesn't have enough "recent pictures" that you already liked/commented?

By the way, I just tried Followgram (who just changed its name to Collecto) to reproduce your error and I didn't had anything about email?
 
Has anyone had trouble with the macros. I was running them for a week or so and now on multiple computers websta after some short time takes me to a white page with nothing but a banner ad and when you try and refresh or go back and search for a new tag it redirects to a white screen with the banner. Tried removing cookies and everything and on two different computers from two different IP's. Any thoughts anyone?
 
I'm having the same problem for a couple of days now. both chrome and firefox. You figure it out jcanada?
 
Back
Top