1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

10 PBN or 50 web 2.0 ?

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by hereweg, Jan 14, 2015.

  1. hereweg

    hereweg Registered Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2014
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    3
    Which one will be better? 10 PBN or 50 web 2.0. Assume: 10 PBN have each 10 uqniue articles and 50 web 2.0 have 2 unique articles each blog.

    Please give me advice. :cool:
     
  2. mextech

    mextech Newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2015
    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yo if it was me I would do both. Depending on your domains what the pbn can deliver for you. Only good a network for is if it's strong.
     
  3. wizard04

    wizard04 Elite Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2014
    Messages:
    2,699
    Likes Received:
    2,533
    Location:
    Outside your house
    The PBN will be own by you then definitively PBN, if not 50 web 2.0.
    If you don't have control over OBL or how other factors the PBN in other hands can be a disaster for your site.
    The web 2.0 with good pyramid linking can give great results.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 2
  4. PandaDomo

    PandaDomo Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,122
    Likes Received:
    450
    Do you already have domains set up for this PBN? If you have good domains already, I would rather have gone for the PBN than the 2.0s.

    Edit: Oh yeah, and do you have separate hosting for this PBN also?
     
  5. Laura4233

    Laura4233 Newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2014
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    Internet Marketer/SEO
    Location:
    Ft. Lauderdale, FL
    I agree... the PBN only if it'll be owned by you and it's quality stuff.
     
  6. tony_d

    tony_d Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2013
    Messages:
    2,582
    Likes Received:
    3,171
    Location:
    1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View CA
    I'm a fan of PBN's (and use my PBN's almost exclusively), but I think there's still something to be said for decent quality, content rich 2.0's.

    I'm not talking about the standard 300-400 words with a picture and youtube video - I'm talking about a proper 'site' built on a 2.0 platform... ie, several thousand words content, plenty of pictures, and plenty of external links other than to your own money site.
     
  7. moonlighsunligh

    moonlighsunligh Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2010
    Messages:
    1,945
    Likes Received:
    280
    Home Page:
    If google really counted web 2.0 as some kind of possible spam site i think they would just deevaluate the whole domain not pages/accounts on case by case basis. But larger word count (per page not account) might be a general criteria.
     
  8. TheNewMiner

    TheNewMiner Registered Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2014
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    9
    Occupation:
    Freelance Web Developer
    Location:
    Chicago
    I would go with the web 2.0s if I were you