Search results

I think the domain extension gets too much attention. A relevant and trusted .com can be more valuable than an unrelated .edu or .gov link. I’d focus more on relevance, page quality, and the actual authority of the linking source.

The Canadian relevance is definitely useful for businesses targeting Canada. I’d mainly check the site’s real organic traffic, niche relevance, indexing history, and link profile rather than relying only on DA/DR.

Start with the basics of SEO, paid ads, social media, and analytics, then choose one area to focus on. The best way to learn is by actually working on a small project and testing what you learn.

I agree. Clients seem much more interested in qualified leads and revenue than vanity metrics. SEO, lead generation, and CRO stand out because their impact can be connected more directly to business growth.

Yes, Google Flow can be useful for experimenting with AI-generated content. The main challenge I’d focus on is keeping the same character consistent across different images and videos.

I’ve seen this too. Before deleting a page with traffic, I’d check its GSC queries, conversions, and backlinks. If the content is no longer needed, a relevant 301 redirect can often preserve some of its value.

I usually start with competitor backlinks and then manually check the sites for relevance and real traffic. Search footprints are useful for finding prospects, but I wouldn't rely on them alone. A lot of sites look good on paper but aren't really worth the placement.

For me, link building takes up most of the time. Finding relevant sites, checking their quality and then doing outreach can take quite a while. Content is easier to plan once the topic is clear, but link building usually needs more manual work.

I think the context is probably more important than the number of mentions. A brand being discussed naturally in a real community seems much more useful than just having the name mentioned on lots of forums. Would be interesting to see if this actually shows up consistently across different brands.

I agree with this. I've also found that a relevant link can be much more useful than a bunch of random backlinks. For me, the biggest difference is usually the relevance of the site and the actual page where the link is placed.

I’ve been wondering how other people handle this because I don’t think there’s really a fixed number that works for every site. When I publish a new page, I usually don’t start building a ton of links straight away. I’ll get the page properly indexed first and give it some time to see how it...

I use AI quite a bit for SEO these days. It’s useful for getting ideas, checking keywords, making outlines, and a bunch of other small things that would normally take time. But I still don’t like relying on it for everything. One thing I wouldn’t fully trust AI with is deciding which keywords...