Search results

Figured i'd update you guys on this post with more detailed info So after seeing mixed suggestions I went on and tested out all 3 options at once by myself. Here are some results Channel 1 - fresh new, new phone, new gmail and basically just a new account received 0 boost from Youtube. All the...

So I have 3 channel options available for my next project involving uploading YT Shorts, but the question is which one of these channels has better potential to be picked up by algorithm in the early stage? 1) Fresh new channel + fresh gmail + fresh phone 2) Old aged account with 4k subs...

Did your old aged channel have videos or they were all deleted?

Depends 1) If a channel was boosted just for monetization with fake subs,likes,watch hours,etc - it's going to be a shot in the dark 2) If a channel was organically monetized in the exact or close to your niche then it's totally worth the investment

Under 1 min = short Over 1 min = long

It boils down to what is currently trending on the YT market and can you adapt that trend into your niche and channel identity (preferably with a unique twist of your creativity)

Are those no-commentary gaming cutscene videos accepted for monetization?

It happens for demonetization, strikes and copyright claims. Depending on the cause and penalty the recovery time of the channel will vary

It's called Audio Visualizer/Audio Spectrum effect.

Yes you're right and not only on older videos but on the new ones as well.

Not a shadowban

It's extremely hard to tell, but most likely your new videos would suffer (especially in the early weeks/months) since people subscribed to the channel would destroy the CTR/Watchtime of your newly published videos.

VidiQ & Tubebuddy both offer that service. A keyword cannot be a low competition keyword if its also highly searched. Whole idea of low competition keyword is its lack of competition by sacrificing the search volume.

The best way to package it as fair use would be to use short clips of the copyrighted content, add narration, edit as much as possible both visually and audio wise. Since the whole fair use is the "Grey Area" of Youtube it really boils down to how "Transformative" your video content will be as a...

Package it under "Fair Use". You may eventually receive a claim since you're dealing with major companies, so it will boil down to you proving that your content indeed fits the "Fair Use".

Only real likes and comments from genuine users can positively impact your video, unless you want to create an illusion with fake social proof

Such content is always gets reused a lot of times on the platform, however if your content is top quality It will be pushed by the algo regardless.

By YouTube's standards the "original content" gets to be approved for monetization. Youtubers whose channels haven't been approved - their content can barely qualify for "original" hence the reason why they're locked out of the partner program. The copyclaim method works best for channels who...

Cutting the material always works the best. Take 5-8 seconds then cut the following 5 seconds , rinse and repeat. No need to zoom,saturate or add anything else.

Solely depends on the content. If the topic of the video you're making is trending in the U.S you'll be fine without proxy.