- Jul 26, 2018
- 3,310
- 1,566
Both have their own value, shorts is good for traffic and subscriber, while long videos if goes viral they do all the job including monetization.
This is a broad and complex topic, but to summarize it briefly: beyond the standard elements everyone knows—such as the title, description, and thumbnail—you need to identify the optimal timing for your target audience.For a new channel starting to create long videos, based on your experience, what elements should be prioritized for optimization?
yeah, it is contingent upon the niche and what you're trying to build. imo shorts are good for discovery, long-form is better for keeping people around and building repeat viewers.It depends on your content because short videos work great for reaching an audience quickly, while longer videos are better suited for longer viewing and building a loyal audience.
Creating a long video and then splitting it into short clips is a time-saving method that also covers both types of traffic. I'll consider it.I think for a new channel, it's best to upload both types of videos. You can take advantage of cutting longer videos into shorter segments to attract viewers to the longer videos.
With a brand new channel, what ratio of long videos to short videos would you recommend each week to avoid burnout while still maintaining your ranking in the recommendation algorithm?I think that using both may be a better idea than using only one format of video. this is becuz short videos enable you to get your new followers faster while long videos give you a bigger chance to grow your audience. You will also be able to make short vds out of long vds nd therefore you will have more videos to post without necessarily creating all of them. Just check how many followers both give you in a matter of weeks.
However, I've noticed that the audience distribution for short videos and long videos is quite different.Both are equally good imo. Shorts can help you get more views quickly, while long videos can keep people watching for longer. I'd try both and see which one works better for your niche.
But wouldn't it be easier to accurately target the right audience from the start if we began with a longer video?Absolutely, I would use the Shorts feature to experiment with various topics and know which topics have more appeal, and those successful topics I would develop into regular videos. Thus you do not have to guess what interests your audience.
I use Gemini; the Pro plan is currently free for students, and the quality is better than expected. I’d rate it as acceptable.Can you recommend some of the best AI tools for cutting short positions currently available?
Every channel gets results according to their unique strategy and what they are here to gain. If you want views you should go for shorts. Some people post to get leads some do affiliate marketing so you can not compare yours to them you should have your own unique strategy.Hi everyone,
I've recently noticed some new YouTube channels making long videos (not short videos) and they're getting hundreds of thousands of views.
So, should my new channel start with just short videos, or should I combine both and experiment with long videos?
If I combine both, should I use YouTube Shorts as a kind of 'teaser' to encourage viewers to click to watch the full length video?Try test both, but focus on long videos if your goal is to build a loyal audience and earn through YouTube ads.
Shorts are great for getting quick exposure and testing content ideas, but views don't always translate into loyal subscribers.