Original, well researched content will always be the stronger foundation. Competitor content can be useful for understanding whats already working and covering the topic properly, but simply rewriting it in your own words does not add much by itself. Your own research, experience, and insights are what make the content more valuable and sustainable.Just curious if I take content from competitors that are already ranking and rewrite it in my own words, can it actually help with rankings?
Has anyone tried this approach and seen good results?
Me too. I use AI to help me search and find information more than for writing. Honestly, the end result still requires that the human touch be added to make sure it is useful.i would assume using ai would help making articles more informative, find gaps, i usually ask my ai to do deep research and give me an article outline and i will decide if its good to develop the content that way, wondering if others have a different strategy
In this regard, originality does not always equate to the creation of somthing that has never been seen before. It is all about the process, experimentation, and how one puts the pieces of information together.Everybody here talks about the originality. But we are not scientists nor inventors. We are almost impossible to output something that is valuable and really novel. Most of the time, we stitch existing things together, and AI can do this much better than us.
Simply rewriting competitor’s content isn’t that much effective. Try using their pages to understand the search intent and topics coverage, then add more information, examples, and a bit of your own insights. That’s what values more than just rewriting.Just curious if I take content from competitors that are already ranking and rewrite it in my own words, can it actually help with rankings?
Has anyone tried this approach and seen good results?