Absolutely not, since feeds may have more edits from the same source, and this will mean that there must be some other criteria which influence recommendations.
Reels with any actual effort put in does well for reach even if the editing is quite simple. It seems that meta is becoming more adept at catching the duplicate content.
in my view, the more important development has been that the reels need to provide something more than the original video alone. videos as basic as these also get good reach if they add a perspective, context or an entirely different way of pressenting the same video. reposting the same with cosmetic changes is far less reliable.
It was mch easier for me to does well with those that are more genuine and have been created from what have actually been read rather than simply using a video clip and adding new text to it. sometimes even simple original work can take one by surprise.
Original content performs extremely well in contrast of unoriginal content. Copied/modified content is just meh when you are promoting it on your page.
Yes, I have seen that original reels were always pushed more, particularly since people actually sees them past the first few seconds. Cloned Reels can be successfull too but they seems less reliable recently.
Original reels always have a priority of getting more reach.Reposting reels not always get much views if the page is small.
I’ve noticed original content seems to perform better too. Even when repurposing content, adding a new hook, editing and context seems to make a big difference compared to simply reposting it.
