Do you still bother with broken link building in 2026, or is it dead?

SK_LinkBuilder · Sunday at 9:13 PM

Used to hear this pitched as an easy win — find broken links on relevant sites, offer your content as the replacement. Haven't seen many people mention it lately, though.

Is it still worth the effort, or has the response rate dropped too low to justify the time versus just doing normal guest post outreach?

nlifvcqf · Sunday at 9:16 PM

It will be much better to do normal guess post outreach. Is not worth the time to use broken links

Chunkulus · Monday at 4:25 AM

The reply above has it backwards, at least on the numbers. Broken link outreach reliably out-replies generic link requests by around ten percentage points, because you open with something useful to them instead of an ask, and it carries the lowest cost per link of the common tactics even though outreach to placement sits at roughly 2 to 5 percent. What actually changed is not the tactic, it is delivery. Cold reply rates fell about 15 percent year on year, and inbox placement to Microsoft hosted domains collapsed from around 77 percent to 51 percent, with Outlook and Hotmail worse still, so a large share of outreach that feels ignored was never delivered at all. Before writing the method off, check what proportion of your prospects sit on Outlook or Hotmail and whether your sending domain is properly authenticated, because that is a deliverability problem wearing a link building costume.

SEOPul · Monday at 5:39 AM

I abandoned it years ago because targeted guest outreach or pitching original data gives you a much better conversion rate for the exact same effort.

yehsa · Monday at 6:01 AM

SK_LinkBuilder said:
Used to hear this pitched as an easy win — find broken links on relevant sites, offer your content as the replacement. Haven't seen many people mention it lately, though.

Is it still worth the effort, or has the response rate dropped too low to justify the time versus just doing normal guest post outreach?

Broken link building can still work, but it's much more competitive than it used to be.
If you have genuinely relevant replacement content, it's worth trying. Otherwise, targeted guest posts and digital PR often provide a better return on time for most campaigns.

FaizankhatriSEO · Monday at 6:01 AM

SK_LinkBuilder said:
Used to hear this pitched as an easy win — find broken links on relevant sites, offer your content as the replacement. Haven't seen many people mention it lately, though.

Is it still worth the effort, or has the response rate dropped too low to justify the time versus just doing normal guest post outreach?

Not dead, but response rate dropped a lot.
Only worth it for high DR + exact niche match now. Guest posts are faster ROI.

SK_LinkBuilder · Monday at 6:26 AM

nlifvcqf said:
It will be much better to do normal guess post outreach. Is not worth the time to use broken links

Makes sense; that lines up with what I was thinking too. Thanks for sharing your experience.

Chunkulus said:
The reply above has it backwards, at least on the numbers. Broken link outreach reliably out-replies generic link requests by around ten percentage points, because you open with something useful to them instead of an ask, and it carries the lowest cost per link of the common tactics even though outreach to placement sits at roughly 2 to 5 percent. What actually changed is not the tactic, it is delivery. Cold reply rates fell about 15 percent year on year, and inbox placement to Microsoft hosted domains collapsed from around 77 percent to 51 percent, with Outlook and Hotmail worse still, so a large share of outreach that feels ignored was never delivered at all. Before writing the method off, check what proportion of your prospects sit on Outlook or Hotmail and whether your sending domain is properly authenticated, because that is a deliverability problem wearing a link building costume.

Disagree respectfully! I think it's more of a deliverability issue than a reply-rate issue. Might be worth checking domain authentication before ruling the tactic out.

SEOPul said:
I abandoned it years ago because targeted guest outreach or pitching original data gives you a much better conversion rate for the exact same effort.

Fair point! Targeted outreach and original data pitches do tend to convert better for the same effort. Different game entirely from broken link building.

Do you still bother with broken link building in 2026, or is it dead?

SK_LinkBuilder

Newbie

nlifvcqf

Newbie

Chunkulus

Registered Member

SEOPul

Newbie

yehsa

Newbie

FaizankhatriSEO

Newbie

SK_LinkBuilder

Newbie

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World