Is LinkedIn becoming oversaturated with AI generated thought leadership content?

LinkedIn engagement quality has changed significantly with the rise of AI generated posts are users and algorithms becoming better at identifying generic thought leadership content and what posting styles are still producing authentic engagement and inbound opportunities
the main change in my opiniion is the emergence of a new value: credibility not formatting. there is no use in the perfect format of a post if the reader understands that it was written by just about anyone. the material that can attract attention necesarily contains personal information, concrete cases, a non standard approach. AI can be used to devellop thoughts while content is based on insights.
 
LinkedIn is atrocious I hate reading through it. Every post or every other post is AI.
 
Yes theres definitely more AI generated content on LinkedIn now which makes generic posts easier to overlook original insights real case studies and practical examples still generate the most authentic engagement and meaningful business opportunities.
 
LinkedIn engagement quality has changed significantly with the rise of AI generated posts are users and algorithms becoming better at identifying generic thought leadership content and what posting styles are still producing authentic engagement and inbound opportunities
I think,it is now becoming oversaturated because many of the users are taking help with AI to build their content.It will lower their ability to do it from his ability.
 
From what I’m seeing, personal experiences and specific real world insights still get the most authentic engagement
They do, in theory, but AI slop is still everywhere on LI lately. Maybe part of it is because a lot of especially corporate people seem like they specifically want to sound like AI. I don't even know..
 
All platforms are flooded with AI generic content but Linkendin is by far the most obvious to spot because employees are trying to impress employers with their leadership and other skills "knowledge". Meanwhile the majority of their posts (approximately 90%) come from AI.
but like doesn't that kind of backfire on the employees tho?? cause if 90% of posts are AI generated and recruiters/employers are literally on the same platform seeing the same generic content everyday — surley they can tell at this point?? like are employers actualy still impressed by it or have they just stoped caring alltogether??
 
Yes that was pretty evidents some time back. The ironic thing is that even today LinkedIn seems to favor individuals who have regular posts compared to those whose posts have a quality element hence many artificial intelligence posts manage to attract decent traffic.
 
Yeah definitely and this has been quite evident for quite some time. linkedIn is still a platform where individuals that constantly post are favored more than the quality of the posts that they make.hence even AI generated content manages to get decent numbers.
 
I think LinkedIn is getting more crowded with similar content. Some posts can feel a bit too polished or repetitive. Clear ideas and a natural writing style can make a post more useful.
 
Back
Top