- May 27, 2022
- 1,232
- 414
This story is NUTS, Has anyone been following the New York case involving dormant Bitcoin wallets?
Some dude in New York is trying to claim $286 BILLION in inactive Bitcoin wallets, he is attempting to claim ownership of wallets that have been inactive for a very long time, arguing that they should be treated as abandoned property. What I'm struggling to understand is how that would work in practice if nobody has the private keys needed to move the coins.
But if the private keys are lost, can a court decision actually give someone access to the Bitcoin?
I'm curious whether this is a serious legal argument or just an interesting test of how existing property laws apply to cryptocurrency.
Some dude in New York is trying to claim $286 BILLION in inactive Bitcoin wallets, he is attempting to claim ownership of wallets that have been inactive for a very long time, arguing that they should be treated as abandoned property. What I'm struggling to understand is how that would work in practice if nobody has the private keys needed to move the coins.
But if the private keys are lost, can a court decision actually give someone access to the Bitcoin?
I'm curious whether this is a serious legal argument or just an interesting test of how existing property laws apply to cryptocurrency.