- Jul 15, 2021
- 909
- 381
Your artist must look so real that they cant tell that they are streamed.
Out of 700 plays a day around 400 are mine!
STREAMING FARMING ?
- Thread starter yuricolngluTR
- Start date
-
- Tags
- spotify streaming farm
Out of 700 plays a day around 400 are mine!
Cruscate
BANNED
- Jan 20, 2022
- 99
- 13
Yes, it still exists. People are doing it, but I won't advice anyone to do it unless you know exactly what you are doing. No results in profits means that you have wasted your time completely.
- Jul 15, 2021
- 909
- 381
gr3gthepilot
Newbie
- Mar 30, 2026
- 13
- 1
Did you test out gologin's own proxy service? If so what are your thoughts?
ForeignCuri
Newbie
- Apr 27, 2026
- 16
- 1
this is a good idea, any information ?
- Jul 15, 2021
- 909
- 381
Information on what?
- Apr 1, 2013
- 172
- 33
yeah bro, streaming farming still exists 100%. spotify, youtube, amazon, even smaller DSPs too. fraud never dies, it just changes form.
but oldschool methods are way harder now. simple VPS + recycled accounts + static proxies type setups get smoked fast. platforms use better behavior models, device fingerprinting, retention checks, session patterns etc. spotify says it actively detects and removes artificial streams, withholds royalties, and penalizes repeat abuse.
nowadays the game is more about quality traffic emulation, aged assets, geo consistency, smart cooldown logic, humanlike session data. if someone still using 2021 methods they are cooked lol.
youtube side also got tighter. watchtime, source diversity, engagement ratio matters more than raw hits. amazon music less talked about, but same story, low quality volume gets noticed.
real update for 2026: farming exists, but margins smaller and setup cost higher. lazy guys lose money fast. coders with private infra + custom tools still move, public panels mostly trash.
shortly yeah it exists.just not easy money anymore bro.
but oldschool methods are way harder now. simple VPS + recycled accounts + static proxies type setups get smoked fast. platforms use better behavior models, device fingerprinting, retention checks, session patterns etc. spotify says it actively detects and removes artificial streams, withholds royalties, and penalizes repeat abuse.
nowadays the game is more about quality traffic emulation, aged assets, geo consistency, smart cooldown logic, humanlike session data. if someone still using 2021 methods they are cooked lol.
youtube side also got tighter. watchtime, source diversity, engagement ratio matters more than raw hits. amazon music less talked about, but same story, low quality volume gets noticed.
real update for 2026: farming exists, but margins smaller and setup cost higher. lazy guys lose money fast. coders with private infra + custom tools still move, public panels mostly trash.
shortly yeah it exists.just not easy money anymore bro.
- Jul 15, 2021
- 909
- 381
Well, thats for the majority of people but not everyone!
And its not really competition. Like the game is soo big, Spotify thinks that 10% of the music WORLDWIDE is only here to be fraudulently used
I see it as protection of i teach the method to others. The more fish are in the tank, the less chance each has to get caught!
e-spider
vierasen
Regular Member
- Jan 26, 2016
- 247
- 73
The proxy layer is where most setups fail in 2026 — the software side has gotten more sophisticated but people are still running it through junk IP infrastructure.
Spotify's fraud detection specifically looks at two things at the network level: ASN reputation and session behavioral consistency. Residential proxies that cycle IPs between streams fail the second test — each new IP looks like a new network context, which doesn't match how a real user listens (same IP for hours of session). You need sticky residential sessions with at least 1-hour persistence, or better yet, actual mobile carrier IPs (4G/5G) that are associated with real devices and behave like someone is actually on their phone listening.
The geo-consistency point that berlack mentioned is important too. Spotify cross-references the account registration geo, the payment method geo, and the streaming IP geo. Mismatches across those three are a hard flag. If your accounts are registered in one country and streaming from IPs in another, the fraud model catches it quickly regardless of how good the behavioral emulation is.
For budget setups, a small pool of dedicated mobile proxies (not shared residential) + proper geo matching is more reliable than expensive software running on cheap, shared IP pools. The infrastructure matters as much as the software.
Spotify's fraud detection specifically looks at two things at the network level: ASN reputation and session behavioral consistency. Residential proxies that cycle IPs between streams fail the second test — each new IP looks like a new network context, which doesn't match how a real user listens (same IP for hours of session). You need sticky residential sessions with at least 1-hour persistence, or better yet, actual mobile carrier IPs (4G/5G) that are associated with real devices and behave like someone is actually on their phone listening.
The geo-consistency point that berlack mentioned is important too. Spotify cross-references the account registration geo, the payment method geo, and the streaming IP geo. Mismatches across those three are a hard flag. If your accounts are registered in one country and streaming from IPs in another, the fraud model catches it quickly regardless of how good the behavioral emulation is.
For budget setups, a small pool of dedicated mobile proxies (not shared residential) + proper geo matching is more reliable than expensive software running on cheap, shared IP pools. The infrastructure matters as much as the software.
- Jun 21, 2024
- 127
- 40
Used to work but now its a waste of time, will be honest
- Apr 23, 2026
- 105
- 53
this is a dead method I would advise against it.
h3yf00l
Newbie
- Jan 7, 2024
- 48
- 49
No , Spotify AI detect if any account listen to only one artist and every same then account blocked, to bypass this you need very sophisticated AI automation and sever cost much more higher and account to add too costly
- Jul 15, 2021
- 909
- 381
- Apr 1, 2013
- 172
- 33
On Spotify’s side, things have become much stricter compared to before; the algorithm now analyzes traffic sources, user behavior, retention time, and account quality much more aggressively, so most classic “farming” methods either don’t reflect at all or get wiped after a short time. But it’s not completely impossible if the traffic looks natural, the speed is balanced, engagement mimics real users, and distribution is done properly, it can still work; in short, it’s harder now, but still doable for those who understand how the system works and adapt to it.
Streaming farms on Spotify and YouTube still exist, but they're difficult and risky now. Raw farms are doomed; you have to fake them to look like real users to survive, and even then, it's not stable. In short: it's still possible, but it's no longer as profitable.
bunnyagency
Newbie
- Aug 26, 2024
- 22
- 0
It can still be done. There are a few things you need to pay attention to