Same settings doesnt always mean same outcome. Every market has different competition and buying habits, so id check what's different in that GEO before making big changes.
I think both can work, but it really depends on how ur whole funnel is setup. If i was starting from zero id go with the platform i understand better first, then test the other one later instead of doing both at once.
On a brand new account, I usually start manual CPC or maximize clicks first. Gives you some data without FB/Google guessing too hard. Once you hit ~20–30 conversions, then I switch to smart bidding—it actually performs. Starting smart from zero usually wastes budget.
If you want something different from Adplexity/Anstrex, check out BigSpy or PowerAdSpy. They’re not perfect for Native, but can still give some good insights and fresh angles. I mix them in when I want extra ideas.
Honestly, it’s usually just the learning phase and audience overlap. Even a “copy” isn’t identical in FB’s eyes, budget, timing, and fresh pixel data all affect results. I’d tweak the audience a bit and give it a few days, don’t expect an exact clone performance.
Exactly. Many beginners think cloaking alone will solve bans, but without understanding ad policies, filtering logic, and account quality, accounts get banned fast. Learn the basics first, then test cloakers according to your budget and traffic flow.
No, you should Not use Facebook cloaking in the very beginning.
First, focus on warming up your ad account and using safer creatives or prelanders. Cloaking can definitely help down the line, but as a beginner, you will usually burn through accounts quickly if your technical setup, proxies, and...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.