Recent content by rogueperry

imo the line is quite clear optimizing the actual citations for greater exposure is SEO or AEO but making up fictitious citations to trick the ai into giving you an answer is just the plain black hat.

Surely but you will not get any growth from zero posts. even without posts you can still generate activity via commnts and live videos but there is a point where you need ur own content to makes people to follow you.

Linking my older and high authority content to my newer content each and every time that i post. no question about it this is the one practice that has generated me the highest return on investment, period.

i found that canonicalization and pagination could get me confused sometimes. It is like you believe that your canonical tags are all gud to go but Google do not care about it and just indexes what it wants. i had to test it extensively to understand it.

The rate of growth is highly dependent on the niche, content quality and audience awareness. As per me, the number of followers is just a measure of growth and is ir relevant to measuring actual growth. There are many cases where accounts have remained not active for a few months and then...

The greatest error made by people who believe in the effectiveness of black hat SEO is the way they view it. While black hat SEO should treated as a science of testing, they treat it as a series of tactics that may be successful or not depending on situations . For a time , a strategy that works...

AI has certainly made the initial stage of black hat SEO very easy but the final one is not an easy task. It becomes easy to generate and test stuff but making it trust worthy for users and something that does not seem like a temp job is a completely different thing altogether. finally ...

I rarely write a full length piece at once now. what happens is that i put out the essenntial piece first and then add to it during the next few weeks depending on search console impressiions and search terms it gets featurred in. The added content comes from real data, not guesses.

During the initial weeks, i am more concerned with impressions than clicks. as long as the impressions continue to increase, google has begin to test the page. In case there is zero impressionn for many weeks, then it can be concluded that the page needs improvement in internal linking or...

In my opinion, content decay is one of the things that people often underestimate. i have encounntered websites where they continue to generate new webpages, yet the old articles get slowly ranked down due to lack of updates. In some cases, updating the content turns out to be more effective...

One of the largest adjustments I have made is no longer making changes to my websites randomly based on SEO without any real facts backing up the decision. Instead, i found myself focusing on where I had success and building on that foundation rather than trying something new all the time.

Old domains can help to save a little bit of time since they might have some trust Factors, but in my opinion, the true benefit is in the history of this domain. It is more important to have a gud history rather than an old registration date.

I use GSC myself, although it is my first point of contact, but do not dwell on day to day variations too much. It is the exceptional variations in traffic, new keywords, and even pages which have traffic but no clicks which are the most helpful.

Most novice pinners try to generate more pins while their main problem lies elsewhere they do not know what type of content pinners save or click on. What I would do is try out various types of pins for only one topic and see which one works best according to the statistics.

Getting noticed on LinkedIn is not about creating viral content but rather crafting a signal for a particular subject. People who have become popular on this platform tend to post valiuable information consistently within one particular field so that others would understand why they need to...