But those reports get reviewed by human staff from ig I imagine. Not only does that not kill the account, but the fake accounts you're using to report it
Imagine a competitor that hates your account.
They make 50 accounts and go to your latest post.
They click into every hashtag you use.
If your post is showing up on top posts,
They click the three dots and mark "Don't Show for This Hashtag"
I know this has an effect on the account taking this...
Yes, I'm specifically talking about followers who have never commented or liked.
I know even nothing has changed, engagement fluctuates +-40%. On some days you will get 1400 likes, others 600 likes. This is a normal variance.
I am still skeptical when people say it works, when it can just be...
i am a dev. it's not much effort. i just need to know before and after if there has been any data that backs it up.
Example: a decrease in followers + increase in engagement per post over a course of 15 days and 15 posts would be solid data
My engagement has been **** lately after weeks of incredible reach with hashtags.
Theory is that I targeted likers and commenters.
With hashtags performing so well, crappy followers started jumping on board.
I am going to start scraping my own posts and in a few months, all non-engagers will be...
swipe up option will get you 1 view maybe. ig encapsulates then url click to their in-app browser, meaning there is no youtube login session, stopping them from subscribing and liking.
i rather tell them about the channel or a new video and have them open the youtube app.
I was thinking this because instagram is owned by facebook. Facebook definitely has a penalties when you try to take users off FB to youtube. Any post with mention of youtube gets no reach.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.