As a newbie, the biggest difference for me was focusing more on search intent rather than just keywords. I had articles targeting the right keywords, but they didn't start improving until I looked at what was already ranking on page one and created content that matched what users were actually...
I still prefer to do keyword research and content review manually. AI tools can save a lot of time, but I don't always trust them to understand search intent or spot small mistakes.
I think it's a combination of topic selection and timing. I have seen some really helpful answers get almost no views, while others take off because they were posted on popular questions with lots of followers.
Honestly, I am not sure there’s any “real manual upvote service” that reliably sticks. From what I have seen, most paid upvote services are either bots or low-quality accounts, and Reddit often removes or ignores them over time.
I think consistency and genuine participation make a biggest difference. The accounts that seem to do well are usually commenting regularly, contributing useful information, and engaging with communities instead of just promoting something.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.