The vast majority of the newspapers will run the same post from Reuters, Bloomberg, AP and others so why don't they get penalized for duplicate content?
Ok, let me rephrase, the potential client wants both links to disappear. The 2nd link I think can be made to vanish but the 1st link is an archived 1990 Chicago Tribune article. That link is on top of more recent posts from LinkedIn, facebook, Meetup, whitepages and Google+. I've never seen...
I prefer to create an account, do a couple of follows, a couple of retweets and a tweet or 2 then let it sit for 7 to 10 days. After that period I slowly ramp it up. It looks more normal that way.
There are 2 links ahead of the potential clients linkedin.com profile. 1.) is a newspaper link 2.) is a wordpress.com hosted blog post. I could maybe understand a newspaper article written in 1990 being ahead of the linkedin.com profile but not a wordpress.com blog post.
My potential client doesn't have access to the old article. The 1st link is from a newspaper but the article is from 1990, the 2nd link is from a wordpress.com hosted blog. The 2nd link is being reported to Wordpress.com as abuse. I've never seen any news article that old override newer posts.
A potential client of mine has an old news article circa April 1990 that always has the 1st slot on the Google search results. The potential client has been writing blogs and other posts that normally push the old article off the 1st page but the old post stubbornly stays in the #1 slot. Any...
I've seen many articles such as the following that say that Google+ has removed circle sharing.
I would love to believe those articles are wrong, could you please post the url to one of your shared circles? I do know that if a circle was shared in a community that they are still accessible, but...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.