Your affiliate posts are ranking much faster than the service articles. Since you found those keywords by checking weaker competitors, I think the same approach might help with your service content. It could be worth checking whether the service keywords are simply more competitive.
You mentioned that two of the four leads weren't a good fit. I think it makes sense to focus on lead quality before increasing the ad budget. €31 per lead sounds good, but what matters more is how many of those leads turn into paying clients.
You mentioned having 13 content pillars ready for the 100 days. Are you planning to track which ones bring in the most followers, or just focus on overall account growth? That could help you decide which types of posts are worth making more of later.
I saw you changed the meme account's daily posting schedule from 2–6 to 5–10. Have you noticed any change in the views each Reel gets, or is it still too early to tell?
Before adding more traffic sources, have you checked GSC to see which service + city pages are already getting impressions? If some pages are sitting around positions 10–30, I’d focus on those first instead of spreading effort across all 5 sites. That should show which locations actually have...
Have you noticed any pattern in the Shorts that keep getting search traffic after the feed push slows down? For example, do they target more specific topics or keywords than the ones that die off? That could help separate the initial Shorts test from the videos that have longer-term search value.
Don’t judge it only by people leaving after one page. Check engagement time too. If someone lands on an article, reads it for 20 or 30 seconds and leaves, that is very different from someone leaving after 2 seconds. Split it by traffic source and landing page before changing the content.
One extra step before the move: lower the DNS TTL ahead of the switch, then keep the old host online for a while after changing DNS. That reduces the chance of some visitors still hitting the old server during propagation.
Hard to say if it was a wider sweep from a few accounts alone. If the accounts are still running normally, check Account Quality and any recent policy or restriction notices before assuming Meta changed something across the board.
Before assuming it’s a shadowban, check YouTube Studio and see if the channel or videos still show any active copyright or restriction issues. If nothing is there, compare the old and new video analytics instead.
The domain may be old, but the current site is still new. Start with a smaller group of good pages and see if Google indexes those before trying to push all 20k pages.
Look for links from real business relationships too. Supplier pages, partner pages, association listings, resource pages, or customer stories can be free and usually make more sense than random submission links.
Passing an AI detector doesn’t say much about whether the article will rank. If you’re rewriting existing posts, just changing the wording isn’t enough. Add new info, examples, updated facts or your own take. A humanizer can make the text sound different, but that alone won’t make it better content.
I don’t think AI itself is the main issue. The bigger problem is publishing a lot of pages that don’t add anything new just to target keywords. If the article actually answers the search and adds useful information, how the first draft was made matters less.
Since the real documents are still getting rejected, I’d stop resubmitting them over and over and ask Meta support for the exact reason. If there’s a mismatch in their records, repeated attempts probably won’t fix it.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.