Recent content by liamparker88

To me the biggest error in judgment was to use ai for publishing decisions rather than for research. If you do not know why people should clicks on ur website getting it published quicker simply means getting un necessary publications.

I had witnessed ranking of bloggers sites hence, I could not pin the failure on the hosting alone. There is usually an other component within the configuration that accounts for the performance differenceas.

I have also experienced that although there were lots of posts on the website, there was very little content for google to index. Writing fewer but more focused articles and refreshing already indexed pages worked for me also .

Well, but the tricky thing is quick. i could concentrate on long tails key words with no competition, good internal linking and some gud topical links within a month there should be progress, but major progress comes later.

of course literally this is actually quite a common feeling lol. my was filled with just my talking to myself in the early days although the achievements in search console appeared every tym before the actual traffic.

It was far much later in life that i realised that posting more is not necessarily going to solve a traffic issue clearly . In many cases 5 well placed pieces of content may performs better than over 30 other articles particularly if you are not sure about the ranking potential of ur website yet.

Fwiw i have found it more effective to have my title matches the query rather than to try and create something overly attractive. a dull title that matches the query can actually beats an exciting one in google.

It has made every little things much faster for me. even though i still have to rewrite many articles since in time you learn how to recognises certain patterns.

I am not concerned about follower numbers anymore. I had seen instances where people who follow me in huge numbers were not buying more from me than people who followed me in lesser numbers.

For me, it is locating sites that are worth spending money on. although many have fairly gud metrics once you dig into their pages, they will be filled with sponsored articles from all kinds of niches making your purchase of that link pointless. Manual link building is slower, but i has achieved...

Many of us spends hours chasing things that we can measures when we should be spending our time on the things that truly makes a difference. An often overlooked wastage of time is that people are always trying to learn some thing new in regards to SEO but they do not spend enough time trying to...

One of the things that i learned is that search engines do not trust websites they trust reliable signals. At one point, there was some pages that did not rank for many months but eventually started ranking once i started updating them rather than coming up with a new article each week...

This is why i like Clarity bcz there are times when it brings out issues that would otherwise not be seen with rankings and analyticss. For instance, you might feel like adding some more information on a particular web page, but after closer inspection, you will find out that people never get to...

The one thing that many forget is that being consistent will also give you a great feedback loop. If you alter 5 aspects of your SEO and then see an improvement in rankings, you have no clue what made it happen. Being consistent will allow you to test, measure, do it again and not get...

The most challeinging aspect for me has been the ability to distingiuish correlation from causation in SEO. You alter a title, add links or modify the content, and the rankings change, but it is not always that a certain change caused this. Many tests were needed before i could stop jumping up...