Recent content by ForeverScrnd

Yup, they updated it recently, almost 1 hour of additional content. But what was related to twitter before - 80% of principles still apply.

Everyone's arguing real vs bought and missing that comments do two different jobs. Algorithmic reach: weakest use. Meta weights who commented and whether the thread went anywhere. Flat comments from accounts with no history with your page do nothing. Social proof: the real use. An empty...

Three phases, in order. Most people skip to the third and wonder why nothing converts. Warm up. A month of silence means the algo deprioritized you - you're not starting from 15k, you're starting from whatever fraction Meta still shows. Post consistently for 2-3 weeks first. Reels get the most...

Everyone's saying "quality content + backlinks" which is true but useless as advice. Two things I'd add that nobody's touched: People authority - E-E-A-T. Not just an author box, an actual person with a footprint outside your site. Real name, real profile, real history in the niche. Google is...

Nobody's said the quiet part: neither one is a business. They're both fulfilment methods. That's why "is X dead in 2026" never resolves - you're asking whether a shipping arrangement is dead. What actually died is arbitrage. There was a window where the gap between AliExpress pricing and what a...

On a scale of 1000s of sites, I'd say negative SEO is basically dead. The Google algos have evolved a lot over the last couple of years - they're just far better at ignoring toxic links than they used to be. What would've tanked a site in 2018 does nothing now. The filter eats it before it ever...

I never got the chance to interact with him directly, and reading this whole thread makes me heartbroken that I didn't. You can tell everything about a person by what people say when he's gone - and every post here says the same thing: kind, helpful, always putting others first. Rest in peace...

Everyone here is answering "what business" when the real question is "what do you actually know how to do already." €85k dropped into an industry you have zero edge in is just a slower way to lose it. The honest math: that amount isn't "start a business" money in most online verticals, it's...

It's not that we forgot how to be bored - it's that boredom got priced out. Every empty minute now has a competing offer: infinite, personalized, free. Your brain does the math and picks the phone. Willpower was never in the fight. And AI made it worse. It's not just content to scroll now -...

Create a small list of accounts to interact with -> start posting a bit -> build a loyal core 50-100 accounts - first with commenting their posts, start posting more and engaging with more people, grow up to 1000 total followers and focus more on content but combined with engagement. Your...

Your own data already answered it - camera videos keep getting views, AI reels die after the first 1-2k. That's not bad luck. The initial 1-2k is the test batch; if retention is weak it stops there. AI and recycled clips get flat retention, so they stall. Your original footage clears the bar...

Going to be the contrarian. If the whole cash cow rests on likes landing within 5 minutes of your own comment, the fragility isn't the panel - it's the dependency. Anything fast and cheap enough to hit that window is exactly the footprint Meta's systems are tuned to catch, and they update more...

I'll throw a different one in the ring since everyone's covering VA/Canva work: iGaming (casino/sportsbook) affiliate. It's been my main income for 10+ years, so speaking from experience, not theory. The honest version - it's not a "no experience, earn today" thing, so don't let anyone sell you...

The 5k vs 100k framing is almost a false choice - on LinkedIn the follower number barely touches distribution anymore. Reach is driven by early engagement, first-hour comments especially, because the algo pushes your post into the networks of whoever comments. 100k passive followers give it...

The "lying" framing is off - it's not inventing anything, it's a retrieval difference. ChatGPT and Gemini were grounding on live search and hit different sources, so different answers. Claude without browsing just answered from training and said it couldn't confirm - which is the honest reply...