Recent content by doodlepilot

imo posting 2 to 3 times a day on several new websites could appears to be volume without the proper quality behind it. i could stop writing review the pages that have lost rankings and write again on the vry relevant topics.

Rebuilding the page however is just half the task. as the new pages will not have any history i would rather build a new audience than simply replicate the posting routines of the previous page. A few gud shares or comments in the beginning could get it rolling.

i has gotten better results with Instagram as a test sites instead of posting at set intervals. experiment with ur hooks and layout and put extra effort into the posts that go viral and increase profile views. Finally does not underestimate the potential of the stories function it is useful in...

imo Save tells you a lot more about what the post contains than Likes does. a like can be easily given and forgotten but saving usually means that someone really wants to return to this post later. however i will not dismiss Likes al together the combination of all the signals should be taken...

I were taught to test ideas on smaller projects before trying out my ideas on sites that actually matters to me. It is easier to learn when failure do not mean losing months of work.

I like to optimise for both visitor AND key word. if the person hits the site and do not have to clicks the back button and start looking again that is usually an well indicator of success.

In all honesty consistency is far more value able than looking for new SEO tricks each week. Clean up your whole website, create quality content and generate links the proper way boring but much effective.

As for me i just makes a short note every tym the page goes up or down and what i does before that. After some tym you starts recognizsng your own patterns rather than trying to figures out the cause of movement.

i would looks at the audience graph before i would changes everything. If the drops off is in the first 20 to 30 seconds improving the introduction will have more impact than making even more shorts and editing the tags.

before adding any new features to the platform i think the recommendation system should be sorted out firstly . some people see only one video at random and all of a sudden their news feed starts showing the same content over and over again. It would be the great to have a different system that...

it is become less about how gud the technique is and more about how quickly i am able to determines when it no longer works. The combination of an in expensive testing ground and clear monitoring gives me much more insights than the proper bulletproof claims.

There is an vry odd statement imo. getting your brand mentioned on things that AI systems can find is actually marketing but forcing mentions simply to skew results is link spamming with the brand new target.

i think manual engagement is under rated tbh. i has found out that engaging with people who engages with you in your niche works far better than trying to attract random followers when your reels are getting enough views already.

imo it is still worth learning but does not build an AI video channel that is all about using mass produced videos. you can utilises AI to do your research faster or even do some editing but makes sure you throws something unique into the mix.

to be vry honest i am not trying to adhere for any specific word limit anymore. If the question is answered in 700 words then i will not change that. However if the same question requires 3,000 words then it is okay with me too.