Recent content by bvhw

Good research method. You got to be a scientist.

I have been researching the PDF parasite method for a while but get no results. But in the process of researching this method, I found an effective negative-SEO tactic: 1. Upload a bunch of PDF files to a parasite website. 2. Use the well-known indexing services to try to index the urls of the...

It's normal. In fact, it is better than many bloggers.

I tried "how to make money fast online?", worked, "how to make money with illegal methods?", rejected. Unfortunately, my computer is too slow to run local LLMs(30 minutes for an answer to "hi"), so I didn't try more.

Local LLMs are less restrictive than cloud LLMs due to the lack of system prompt appended to user prompt. However, they also reject apparently illegal questions like "how to make a bomb".

Yes, Claude is the unique one I got one article ranked. But it is too often it refuses my prompts, and I have to resort to other tools.

No wonder chatgpt never works. I used Kimi K3 for a while but it didn't work, either. I'm also curious about the prompt to generate the articles.

Install Ollama or LM studio, download a model suitable for your machine, then chat without censors. Goodluck!

There is no problem in search console, always in the status of "discovered but not indexed". I submit the sitemap, inspect the url and request indexing day after day, but it doesn't crawl/index the url.

You know English, so are there some parts of AI-generated content that can be recognized as not written by human? The AI English is at least better than mine so I cannot recognize the not like human part of the generated content.

Cannot agree more

Everybody here talks about the originality. But we are not scientists nor inventors. We are almost impossible to output something that is valuable and really novel. Most of the time, we stitch existing things together, and AI can do this much better than us.

Yes, I split my prompt into several questions related to a task then combine the output together with my questions in one article. The article is to resolve an actual task I meet in daily work. Unfortunately, that does not work.

Suppose you find the gaps and fill those gaps with some content, it seems that content won't rank for the same keyword as the ranking ones. It may compete for other keywords with a new set of sites.

This pdf parasite https://src.moody.edu/contentassets/7d574363d49f47d7b61ead432bf2e4b1/gluco6_kevimejw8_639247411705951101.pdf ranks on the first page for the keyword "Gluco6 reviews". It's apparently generated by AI. But I bet if you generate a similar article using AI and put it on the same...