Recent content by Bot Inspector

It's not easy to integrate such parser in WP plugin. You need to create an API for a standalone headless/remote browser which will receive URL, makes parsing and return results. My advice: hire a coder for that.

The best way is to use scarper which executes javascript.

"Safe pages" are usual web pages which do not break rules of traffic source. But there is no such thing as "fair price", there is market. Find some more alternatives and choose the reasonable one.

Well, in nutshell cloaking is easy: get a lot of traffic, analyze it, find bots/accessors, collect their IPs/ASNs/other footprints, cloak em all. :) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking

You are asking about very large area of expertise. Cloaking and doorways are different tasks, which both need different tools and knowledge. If you want to make doorways, you need good practice in analyzing SERPs and some programming skills or paid coder or good flexible doorgen. Then you...

There are a lot of parameters you should check except IP/UA/Referers (the last two are easily faked). Good cloaking consist of three parts: 1. Auditing a huge amount of traffic and collecting information. 2. Detecting anomalies and patterns. 3. Technical implementation of cloaking, and it...

Great! If it's possible, please let me know if the problem was caused by cloaking.

If it is possible, you could try to make an absolutely WHITE version of landing page, without any kind of monetization. And keep all other settings (including even cloaking) the same. It will be some kind of "canary testing". If it will be banned after €171 limit, you need to change ONE...

I never worked with fb (actually, I'm an engineer and data scientist) so it could be a wild guess, but don't you ever think it could be some kind of "shadow ban"? When your landing page/credit card/any other fingerprint got flagged but it's triggered only when you spend about €171. They...

Since we are in the "Cloaking" section of the board, I am thinking about it in the aspect of cloaking. On a such low traffic volume a ban can occur either because of user reports or some fb-bots undetected by your cloak. The possible solution for the second option is an in-depth analysis of...

How much traffic do you get before account is banned? I'm asking this because I'm guessing the probability of accumulating enough "big data" (in your case it's actually quite "small" I guess :) ) for later analysis.

If your will read all the thread you will find that he have enough reasons not to contact fb support. :)

Did you try any other cloaking methods?

modern ppc are actually dead (except when it is adwords or something white and big) because there are a lot of bots in traffic