Recent content by Aryanking

Sitewides have bad reputation for gaming the SE... but as with most things seo related... its really a numbers game... and the reputation/trust ratio of the link host sites.... that determines if the sitewide links will likely land you a penalty

Tier 2? why not tier 1?

backlinks from relevant authoritative sites, quality content, not too many outbound link

The answer to OPs question varies with clients situation, resources required to provide solution, and timeframe of required results, but can go anywhere from 500 - 5000$ /month on average, can be allot more depending on severity of situation.

I think op really means, he wishes anchors we not so important... to google... because op know why it is important.. because google says so... no furthur explanation is needed.. unless we as a web society are prepared to boycot google...

its just a feedback form.. so google can improve their algo next run or issue a manual penalty to spam sites..

How does one demonstrate keyword relevance in a tweeted URL? Would you have to include in the tweet , a hashtag of the keywords ?

I think it depends on the situation: two common situations: 1/ site hosting link and has many hidden outbounds will get penalized 2/ Site link is pointing to has many hidden inbound links gets penalized In order to determine the facts, one would have to perform seo experiments .... but i...

Can i see sample please. Thanks in advance.

Somehow i missed the element of surprise in this REVELATION

Nothing new here to see... keep moving along... thanks... remember people.... google is an advertising company first and a search engine second... the mind fuck is fundamental to their continuous existence...

Sure it can hurt your site.... do backlink profile analysis to make sure its clean..... before using it.....

Try using the password ...... :) bruteforcer...

Actually im the zoo keeper, my sign said "dont feed the penguins spam, give them green eggs and ham"

Unless your planning for your new site to get filtered for duplicate content, then it seems like a good move. Though one can argue that If the original site gets hit, then its content may not be viewed by the algo as the original or perhaps simply devalued, though i think google's cache...