Recent content by andrei.p

Well, search imitates life. When you shop for a new pair of sneakers, do you do tons of research and go for an obscure but possibly superior quality brand or do you buy whatever's latest from a popular brand? Most people just go for the brand. Search is the same - you see ten snippets, you click...

Hi, I'm the writer behind the article. Came here to apologize to those of you who found it too basic. We've just had an influx of new users and went with a beginner piece of content, but our articles usually vary in level of expertise from week to week. Hope you are not completely turned off...

Hi, I'm one of the authors over there. Sure, we include our products in some of our posts, that's how we can afford to create content. We do our best to keep the product mentions below the threshold of annoyance, and we write our guides in a way that they are still actionable even if you don't...

Those are not ranking factors, those are the guidelines for human quality raters - literally the metrics that cannot yet be measured by the algorithm, so google has to hire thousands of humans to check them. Some of the things mentioned in the QRG may have become ranking factors, but there is...

I'm sorry, man, but I would have to disagree with most of your points. First, correct me if I'm wrong, but Google has never published a list of 200 ranking factors. Cutts had once, very long ago, mentioned they use over 200 ranking factors, but the lists themselves came from Brian Dean and the...

They are summarized inside the article. You don't have to read the whole thing, just the parts where it says "seo implications"

I'm a non-native speaker. It took me about five years of copywriting to become bearable. That's after learning English continuously for about twenty years. One thing that was most helpful for me is watching US TV shows - that's as close as you can get to experiencing the actual way people use...