Weird phone verifications..

[TheFact]

Same for me. Got alot of accounts created in the same batch that work like a charm for months. Also every account on my dynamic ip (3 created a month ago) seam to never get any problems at all.
Tried different proxy providers aswell all with virgin IG. Having the same issues. Different softwares, same thing.
Honestly just hoping for the PV to end somewhen. Alot of unnessecary work

 

[Thaman]

Who are you guys buying accounts from? Maybe the seller is bad.

 

[TheFact]

Self created. As usual

 

[pureaccounts]

Who are you guys buying accounts from? Maybe the seller is bad.

can u try from our accounts

 

[madblackhatter1000]

It's your settings dude nothing else. I can suggest few things, change video hash if you use videos, select image modifications level at hard in MP, if you are posting same images to all accounts (add a delay between each via mp), biggest thing - MAKE SURE YOUR ACCOUNTS AREN'T FOLLOWING VIA EMBEDDED BROWSER !

I'm curious about this setting to not follow via embedded browser. What are the pro's and cons of checking the box? What does this change? By default it is unchecked...

 

[Thaman]

I'm curious about this setting to not follow via embedded browser. What are the pro's and cons of checking the box? What does this change? By default it is unchecked...

I tried it with checking the boxes, it made no difference at all. Actually it seems like I get more PVA if I check them.

 

[madblackhatter1000]

I tried it with checking the boxes, it made no difference at all. Actually it seems like I get more PVA if I check them.

I could be completely wrong, so please correct me.... but the embedded browser is supposed to emulate human browser activity on a phone, while the other way is an API call typically used by other iPhone Android 3rd-Party Apps. Wouldn't following 500 users per day via the API look a lot more Bot than an embedded browser trying to emulate a human? If this logic is correct, leaving the box unchecked should be better...

 

[Thaman]

Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying, it seemed that the PVAs got worse when I checked the "Don't use embedded browser..." option.

 

[madblackhatter1000]

Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying, it seemed that the PVAs got worse when I checked the "Don't use embedded browser..." option.

yep. I suspect this setting is for machines with low RAM.

 

[NetPirate]

What I think is Instagram just knows you are bot the moment you login with proxy with massplanner
The reason is, think about it, suppose you make a bot which emulates human behavior and query some keywords to crawl google, but somehow google just knows you are bot and they give you captcha
Even if massplanner uses real mobile api to emulate human behind instagram app, it doesn't take a genius for them to recognize that your connection & behavior with them isn't natural

So my theory is they just know you are bot. But that doesn't mean they will block you 100%
They will bear with the bot if it behaves well under their tos

 

[tux]

I could be completely wrong, so please correct me.... but the embedded browser is supposed to emulate human browser activity on a phone, while the other way is an API call typically used by other iPhone Android 3rd-Party Apps. Wouldn't following 500 users per day via the API look a lot more Bot than an embedded browser trying to emulate a human? If this logic is correct, leaving the box unchecked should be better...

Yeah, that's exactly what I'm saying, it seemed that the PVAs got worse when I checked the "Don't use embedded browser..." option.

No embedded browser emulates a web browser (i.e what you see on mobile or pc if you go to instagram.com), how many users do you think use instagram via web ? On top of that you are following 500+ a day via web browser whereas ig is clearly meant to be used as an mobile app. So following 500 users via their mobile app everyday is ok whereas following them via web browser everday clearly reeks of automation (for ex - imacros script) . You should try split testing things and stuff, i'm doing my own tests and trying to bypass pv's . Things you should look out for -
1 . use api
2. have some sleep times

No one will tell you their secret to bypass pv so figure it out yourselves and keep it to yourself.

 

[madblackhatter1000]

No embedded browser emulates a web browser (i.e what you see on mobile or pc if you go to instagram.com), how many users do you think use instagram via web ? On top of that you are following 500+ a day via web browser whereas ig is clearly meant to be used as an mobile app. So following 500 users via their mobile app everyday is ok whereas following them via web browser everday clearly reeks of automation (for ex - imacros script) . You should try split testing things and stuff, i'm doing my own tests and trying to bypass pv's . Things you should look out for -
1 . use api
2. have some sleep times

No one will tell you their secret to bypass pv so figure it out yourselves and keep it to yourself.

Sounds like you're the expert on MassPlanner settings. So do you leave this box checked or unchecked:
[ ] Do not follow via embedded browser

 

[madblackhatter1000]

No one will tell you their secret to bypass pv so figure it out yourselves and keep it to yourself.

Are you saying you found a way to bypass PVA... as in if your account gets locked with a Phone Number Verification... you can do some magical secret stuff, and the PVA disappears completely, without ever having to use a phone number? You don't have to tell me what you do.

 

[tux]

Are you saying you found a way to bypass PVA... as in if your account gets locked with a Phone Number Verification... you can do some magical secret stuff, and the PVA disappears completely, without ever having to use a phone number? You don't have to tell me what you do.

No it's doesn't work like that lol, you need a number when that happens. I'm talking about studying patterns and bypassing PVA altogether so your account doesn't ask for Pv. Shit used to be easy till November and then ig is catching up ever since.

 

[tux]

Sounds like you're the expert on MassPlanner settings. So do you leave this box checked or unchecked:
[ ] Do not follow via embedded browser

I leave this box checked but i make sure the ACC's aren't using only embedded browser to follow, if that's the case i stop the follow tool completely for a day or two

 

[Thaman]

I leave this box checked but i make sure the ACC's aren't using only embedded browser to follow, if that's the case i stop the follow tool completely for a day or two

How do you make sure of that?

Also, after I ticked this on, I seemed to be getting more PVAs. And on my different VPS I run accounts for non spam accounts, not one has this option checked, and have had absolutely 0 problems with those accounts.

 

[tux]

How do you make sure of that?

Also, after I ticked this on, I seemed to be getting more PVAs. And on my different VPS I run accounts for non spam accounts, not one has this option checked, and have had absolutely 0 problems with those accounts.

you said it yourself - on my different VPS I run accounts for non spam accounts, not one has this option checked, and have had absolutely 0 problems with those accounts. I make sure of that by seeings follow logs of the accs if its asking for too much pv.

 

[Thaman]

you said it yourself - on my different VPS I run accounts for non spam accounts, not one has this option checked, and have had absolutely 0 problems with those accounts. I make sure of that by seeings follow logs of the accs if its asking for too much pv.

I meant that the accounts without problems ARE USING EMBEDDED BROWSER TO FOLLOW.

I also PVed a few spam accounts, checked "don't use embedded browser to follow" and rested them for 3 days after PVA, restarted them, they got hit by PVA again.


Are you saying you managed to avoid PVAs by checking this option?

 

[arpitsoni]

because the website is not looking for spam or may be your activities are unnatural

 

[tux]

I meant that the accounts without problems ARE USING EMBEDDED BROWSER TO FOLLOW.

I also PVed a few spam accounts, checked "don't use embedded browser to follow" and rested them for 3 days after PVA, restarted them, they got hit by PVA again.


Are you saying you managed to avoid PVAs by checking this option?

yes i have this option checked (when its disabled accounts do less follows) , i have no problems when that account is unchecked. Do this try sending say 5 dms everyday with a general spintax and see if it works to reduce pvs.