SEO relevancy amplifiying method [GIVEAWAY]

[tar729]

https://vk.com/id259089795?z=photo259089795_456239024/photos259089795

Keyes 2 years. (nothing lasts forever)
the main request is to direct. This is conceptually equivalent to the query advertising in AdWords
As you can see in the SERPS my sites ahead of the vital website advertising service of Yandex.
both sites, overtaking each other in the SERP moved to the Top of the 4 months.
No more links to these sites were not.

 

[tar729]

this thread has links to the Google patents on the basis of which working SEO transistor. (about adding PageRank page of outbound links from it).
And you can assume that it only works in Yandex
It works everywhere, and Bing and Baidu and Google.
Examples of Google not just because none of you approached me. All smart decided to do everything themselves.
Fans of freebies

you lost a WHOLE YEAR!!!
and I could get rich if you weren't so greedy and arrogant.


you are there at in dot com not use semantic graphs. Do not build on the basis of their semantic core. You use only Google planner to be semantic garbage, instead of doing the right kernel, with the center of the main keywords.
Understand that search engines are working on graphs.
But your famous guru in SEO even do not dig in this direction!
Relevance is built in the search engines according to the count.
What results do you expect to get?
Well, did the right structure. But this is not ENOUGH!
Of course, you have failed...how could expect other?


experts on SEO in Russia is very much ahead of you.
About as well as you ahead of Russia in the economy
You have only just begun the process of automating purchase links. You pray to sape.ru make yourself similar services purchase links.
In Russia this process has long ended.
Earlier in Sapa were a million sites that sell links, but now there were only 100,000 websites.
Sapa on the Russian market is almost dead. Yandex cleans from the index base sites are made for Sapa. They remained in the index of Google.
You still judge the weight of links on fake PR (tf cf), I believe that the more links your website stands for the donor, the better the quality of the link that is from this page It's not.
You have no ONE is able to measure the actual link weight - degree of usefulness of each reference.
You are just in the stone age

 

[brocrates]

@tar729,

Can you please re-link to the Google patents that are relevant to the transistor link structure? I've looked through the thread twice for the links and missed them.

 

[tar729]

@tar729,

Can you please re-link to the Google patents that are relevant to the transistor link structure? I've looked through the thread twice for the links and missed them.

Google patent concerns not the structure. It concerns the bonus of the trust over the relevant outbound link.
Structure relates to the organization of these bonuses.
In one structure, the accumulation of bonuses on the main page.
In another conventional structure is used to transfer weight to the main page.
Do you want to in the patent of Google described SEO transistor?

 

[darulez]

Actually BestProducts does all sorts of shady stuff... Look at their backlinks a few pages deep in ahrefs; tons fo guest book spam and weird chinese links... Looks like automated spam stuff generated with a tool like GSA to their money site... lol they are too powerful; organic traffic over a milllion and have tons and tons of good links from their other magazine sites.

honestly.. you dont have to go further than tier 1 to see what they are doing.
they are AQUIRING links from EVERY HIGH DR site out there. even .de!

i bet they could rank #4 for "best cialis 2017"

oh, and they got two tiers behind their "content links". I like that.
only "loans" niche and casino works with 3 tiers o posts ..

 

[tar729]

one of the participants of this forum is learning technology. He knows Russian perfectly.
You can team up with him. He translated into Russian simultaneously you on Skype.

 

[THUNDERELVI]

i tried now 3 pair of transistor pages. they are up for 2 month ..... and the ranking did not change for the pages.
conclusion ......in google its NOT working. the mentioned level up of the pages because of the linking structure is not leveling up in google.
maybe in yandrix i did not check the ranking there.

Just because it doesn't work for you, that doesn't mean it doesn't work in general. It may simply be that you fucked up, which most probably it's the case here. Oh and keyword relevancy is everything. I do believe the OP when he says that choosing the right relevant keywords will either make or break this method. His theory of graphs is right. Google works with graphs. I studied CS back in college and we developed in-class a very simple algorithm to extract meaning from words and put the results on a graph. Kinda what Google does, but of course on steroids. Most complex algorithms that analyze things and need to output weighted results work on graphs. I could tell you countless other algorithms that you use in your everyday life without realizing that work on graphs. So yes, the OP is right about that. Have I bought his service? No, most probably won't, at least not in the near future, since my websites are ranking perfectly fine with my methods.

 

[h2obrandon]

Thanks, OP,
I really don't understand why this is supposed to be new. Can someone explain to me how this isn't the same old stuff rehashed with a twist? Semantic search and linking has been discussed for years and these interlinking structures are nothing I haven't seen for years? Just made with paint this time lol. I feel all of you should have reached this point in your testing (at least those a few years in) Discussing how links at top of page have more authority (all of this is just combined information that's been shared on these style forums for years. Rehashed to be Resold IMHO

 

[Wilson Grant Fisk]

Thread reported, this looks like a sales thread for OP

hi.
I've been here where it was reported that you will not be able to test the transistor without my semantic kernels that are made by service http://levsha-instruments.ru/
I gave you this technology is for reference, to explain the principle of operation. Anything free does not happen.
This works in Google and Bing and Baidu, in any search engine. The principles on which the transistor is fundamental and can't change.
But with technology, I repeat, need my product. It makes ONLY I.
I wouldn't WA to talk about technology, if you could apply it for free.
Please contact me in Skype and talk about it.

I already told you that without my product, you will not succeed.
Can make 100 transistors with the same result
But you don't listen.

I already told you.
Without the participation of my WebService is IMPOSSIBLE to make a working transistor.


I only describe the principle and all.
what fool would give the public a working technology?
To like you free get to use it? Without me?
No fools.

 

[bartosimpsonio]

Thread reported, this looks like a sales thread for OP

There's some interesting content in here. Perhaps OP can remove the commercial references? There are some good ideas I'm trying to grasp here.

 

[brocrates]

@tar729

The patents I'd like links to are the patents you mention here:

this thread has links to the Google patents on the basis of which working SEO transistor. (about adding PageRank page of outbound links from it).

I'd like to read and solve for the graphs that maximize the 'transistor' effect myself. There's usually a lot of subtleties and profit in mathematical ideas that get lost in translation to ordinary language.

 

[bartosimpsonio]

@tar729

The patents I'd like links to are the patents you mention here:



I'd like to read and solve for the graphs that maximize the 'transistor' effect myself. There's usually a lot of subtleties and profit in mathematical ideas that get lost in translation to ordinary language.

Do you work at Google?

 

[iModBot]

hi.
I've been here where it was reported that you will not be able to test the transistor without my semantic kernels that are made by service http://levsha-instruments.ru/
I gave you this technology is for reference, to explain the principle of operation. Anything free does not happen.
This works in Google and Bing and Baidu, in any search engine. The principles on which the transistor is fundamental and can't change.
But with technology, I repeat, need my product. It makes ONLY I.
I wouldn't WA to talk about technology, if you could apply it for free.
Please contact me in Skype and talk about it.

This seems to have turned into a sales thread, what a shame.

Thread closed.