Will it work for PBNs?

[patlang]

Hello, I came up with this idea

TIER 1
Would it be possible to create a new domains and treat it as if it would be a PBN site (write high quality articles, pictures, etc.). Like 5-10 domains.
TIER2
Create a lot of Web 2.0 also high quality
TIER3
Pump the Web 2.0s with spam.

This of course would have lower power than a PBN, but would it bring in a decent result? Or is it not useful at all?

 

[powermax]

It will work but why do you want to spend time building up the authority. Dont you think it would be better buying domain with authority. True, its a painful job to go through the due diligence process to filter the domain but it will pay off or else use any domain broker if you do not have time

 

[Nargil]

Terrible idea. Why do you even bother with the entire "PBN" level? Just point the web 2.0s there or just buy decent PBN domains and you will have better results and even save money. These techniques that will never work and only aim for saving as much money as possible while cutting corners wherever possible and hoping for results are doomed to failure.

 

[tacopanaya]

Without authority built in your tier 1 PBN websites, they will not be of much help in your rankings. I do think it's not a good idea. You might use the same budget to buy 5 high quality expired domains and it will help you much more.

 

[Samwacgamchy]

you might save some money making decent pbns rather than above idea. One thinks web 20s are cheap and so is spam links. But i could cost more than $100 for decent web 20s and tier 3 links. Better spend that money on some quality domains and build backlinks from them.

 

[Ding Dong]

Hey OP,

You need to work more on this. Read more about PBN networks. The idea which you mentioned will not help you either making money and ranking. You have to get links from authority sites.

 

[stack paper]

If it ain't broke... Don't fix it.

 

[jackteam]

Hello, I came up with this idea

TIER 1
Would it be possible to create a new domains and treat it as if it would be a PBN site (write high quality articles, pictures, etc.). Like 5-10 domains.
TIER2
Create a lot of Web 2.0 also high quality
TIER3
Pump the Web 2.0s with spam.

This of course would have lower power than a PBN, but would it bring in a decent result? Or is it not useful at all?

Building PBN's with fresh domains are not good and they will not help in ranking much. You need to follow many things to make private blog network. If your keyword is Low competitive then you can rank them with some web2.0, then starts with PBN and High authority Links.

 

[patlang]

Terrible idea. Why do you even bother with the entire "PBN" level? Just point the web 2.0s there or just buy decent PBN domains and you will have better results and even save money. These techniques that will never work and only aim for saving as much money as possible while cutting corners wherever possible and hoping for results are doomed to failure.

So have you ever tried ranking with this method? I have been doing a research lately and found several websites ranking this way. All exact match anchors were places on a domain which were created 3 months back and spammed with GSA.

Hey OP,

You need to work more on this. Read more about PBN networks. The idea which you mentioned will not help you either making money and ranking. You have to get links from authority sites.

I agree with the authority sites. That is why you link a new domain for like 2-3 untill it gets some authority, don't you?

Building PBN's with fresh domains are not good and they will not help in ranking much. You need to follow many things to make private blog network. If your keyword is Low competitive then you can rank them with some web2.0, then starts with PBN and High authority Links.

Freshly created web 2.0 has as little power as a new global com domain. In terms of the second option you have more control over it and are ensured the link will not get removed.

 

[David Jones]

yes its work perfectly but hide your foot print when you build this network.

 

[Nargil]

So have you ever tried ranking with this method? I have been doing a research lately and found several websites ranking this way. All exact match anchors were places on a domain which were created 3 months back and spammed with GSA.



I agree with the authority sites. That is why you link a new domain for like 2-3 untill it gets some authority, don't you?



Freshly created web 2.0 has as little power as a new global com domain. In terms of the second option you have more control over it and are ensured the link will not get removed.

There's MUCH more to that than what you are able to see. And even then, it won't last long at all.

 

[Poker Rakeback Mafia]

I was about to make the point when i realised that it had already been said.

A fresh domain with links to it is obviously just as powerful as a fresh web 2.0 with links to it. And stronger if you believe the people who say that google has de valued web 2.0 links, although I don't know if that is true.

 

[starki]

What makes PBNs powerful is using expired domains with backlinks you can't build yourself, links from strong authority sites that would never ever think about linking to you.

If you want PBN sites with shitty links, you can go register one of the spammed expired domains noone wants. You'll find them at registration price and for every niche you want. But you'll end up with the same result as spamming new domains yourself....a bad one.

 

[patlang]

yes its work perfectly but hide your foot print when you build this network.

Do you have any experience in this field? If so, can you shary any details on how to set the linking campaign?

There's MUCH more to that than what you are able to see. And even then, it won't last long at all.

I get your point, however: 1. In those cases I mentioned I am 100% sure this is the only linking method they use. 2. I am not talking about how long it may last for but whether this method ranks or not.

I was about to make the point when i realised that it had already been said.

A fresh domain with links to it is obviously just as powerful as a fresh web 2.0 with links to it. And stronger if you believe the people who say that google has de valued web 2.0 links, although I don't know if that is true.

True, that is the reason I came up with this idea which I am going to test for sure on some duplicated project of mine.

What makes PBNs powerful is using expired domains with backlinks you can't build yourself, links from strong authority sites that would never ever think about linking to you.

If you want PBN sites with shitty links, you can go register one of the spammed expired domains noone wants. You'll find them at registration price and for every niche you want. But you'll end up with the same result as spamming new domains yourself....a bad one.

I do know what is the purpose of PBNs, especially an expired domain with some history cause a PBN has a broad meaning. In this thread I am talking about a new linking method which I believe may work. Like I said I am going to test it. A lot of people rank (I mean low/moderate KW) with fresh web 2.0. so why not to try with fresh global com domains? I assume at first it will not give any power at all. However after around 3 months of constant link building (knowingly set GSA campaigns) it may work...

 

[Seolb]

Build unique sites with all unique stuffs like content, template design, social signal account pass to them, etc. This way of building sites will help to rank your money sites in G SERP.