Anyone has tried ArticleForge?

Will there be some update because article forge is really slow right now. Also, where we can contact support?
 
In the free trial sign up page - if i use Paypal, will I be billed immediately or will it send a $0 payment?
They don't bill you immediately. They bill after your 5-day trial is over. If you don't want to be billed automatically you need to change it in your PayPal options. I did try it but was very disappointed.
 
still, I didn't try . I will update here when I try with this mate
 
I've been using it for T2 and a bit of T1.

The T2 is using the scheduler, but I've noticed it isn't attaching any photos or videos to the post, I've tried different probabilities ranging from 20-100% and never get them. Is there a bug?
 
I've been using it for T2 and a bit of T1.

The T2 is using the scheduler, but I've noticed it isn't attaching any photos or videos to the post, I've tried different probabilities ranging from 20-100% and never get them. Is there a bug?
It could be. Could you submit a support ticket referencing this post and we can take a look at your specific articles? Thanks!
 
We tested it and come out with decision that at its current stage is not worth the price.
 
I've been using ArticleForge for posting to my network of 500K Web 2.0 accounts using my software. Quality of Content is decent and still meets my need (indexing rate is ok).
 
I've been using ArticleForge for posting to my network of 500K Web 2.0 accounts using my software. Quality of Content is decent and still meets my need (indexing rate is ok).
Hmm - dont see Rankerx API for Article Forge - thats a lot of cutting and pasting for 500K sites.

Article Forge might be good someday but not yet. Content is "so so", has recurring bugs that have been reported, no incremental updates. When release 1.5 came out months ago they said they were working hard or release 2.0. Their support now says release 2 will be available sometime in the spring.
 
I was using it for Tier 2 for the last one year. It was quite good, but last 3-4 months it became the worst. Like you put your keyword Cow, and it will deliver you 500 words article. All readable and unique no issue. But the fact is what it generates. Guess it contains 5 paragraph splitting into 500 words. Then this picture can explain the scenario best I guess -

xQfcQHG
 
Is there a way to limit the number of keywords replaced w/ links in a post?

Example, I might have 10 different keywords appear in an article.. but I only want 1-3 links per post.
 
I've been using ArticleForge for posting to my network of 500K Web 2.0 accounts using my software. Quality of Content is decent and still meets my need (indexing rate is ok).

how do you use articleforge with it? ive been waiting for quite a while for integration with RX. is there a workaround? thanks!
 
I have found AF to be weak for the past 3-4 months also. However, a friend of mine sent me some articles from his AF license and they were awesome. I've tried generic content to pad out pbns/news sites and it's terrible. It's like I have a retarded version of AF. I really want to like it more, seeing as I had WordAi for 2-3 years and their tools seem to be great.

Obviously it's not an easy task getting decent content on similar keywords or a narrow market but I've found it's across the board now, to the point where I spend 10 mins editing them to the point where I end up deleting half and I always go over my monthly quota, too so it costs me far more than advertised, I'm fine with that as I'm a heavy user but it needs to be better...but I don't see a competitor/replacement out there right now.
 
I was using it for Tier 2 for the last one year. It was quite good, but last 3-4 months it became the worst. Like you put your keyword Cow, and it will deliver you 500 words article. All readable and unique no issue. But the fact is what it generates. Guess it contains 5 paragraph splitting into 500 words. Then this picture can explain the scenario best I guess -
I understand this feedback entirely and it is something we will be trying to address in Article Forge Version 2. For Article Forge Version 1.5 our most important goal was to make sure that each paragraph was coherent and on topic, as before paragraphs would go off on irrelevant tangents. Version 1.5 addressed that heavily by allowing sub paragraphs to have some freedom as to what they were talking about (with the idea that they were all sub topics of your main keyword), but for Version 2 we are very confident we have improvements that will keep the entire article completely on point to avoid the article structure you are describing.

I have found AF to be weak for the past 3-4 months also. However, a friend of mine sent me some articles from his AF license and they were awesome. I've tried generic content to pad out pbns/news sites and it's terrible. It's like I have a retarded version of AF. I really want to like it more, seeing as I had WordAi for 2-3 years and their tools seem to be great.

Obviously it's not an easy task getting decent content on similar keywords or a narrow market but I've found it's across the board now, to the point where I spend 10 mins editing them to the point where I end up deleting half and I always go over my monthly quota, too so it costs me far more than advertised, I'm fine with that as I'm a heavy user but it needs to be better...but I don't see a competitor/replacement out there right now.
Could you PM me the keywords you are using and your username? Article Forge is certainly stronger for some keywords/topics than others and this will help us a lot as we develop Version 2. WordAi had huge improvements between Version 2 and Version 3 so I'm confident you'll feel the same way about Article Forge after we have a full major update under our belt to address the areas where it is currently most weak.
Article Forge might be good someday but not yet. Content is "so so", has recurring bugs that have been reported, no incremental updates.
Could you PM me the incremental bugs you are talking about? If they are things that need to be solved by improving AI it might be limited to Version 2, but if they are squarely in the "bug" category I'll make sure they get looked at before then.
Is there a way to limit the number of keywords replaced w/ links in a post?

Example, I might have 10 different keywords appear in an article.. but I only want 1-3 links per post.
If you are ok with having multiple keywords map to the same URL you can just add them all in one keyword list and have it only replace the first instance of the first keyword.
 
I understand this feedback entirely and it is something we will be trying to address in Article Forge Version 2. For Article Forge Version 1.5 our most important goal was to make sure that each paragraph was coherent and on topic, as before paragraphs would go off on irrelevant tangents. Version 1.5 addressed that heavily by allowing sub paragraphs to have some freedom as to what they were talking about (with the idea that they were all sub topics of your main keyword), but for Version 2 we are very confident we have improvements that will keep the entire article completely on point to avoid the article structure you are describing.

Sounds good. I am using it for the last one year for all my 2nd tier links. But decided not to renew my monthly subscription from this month. When do you think version 2.0 will be launched? Lets wait for this one :-)
 
Thanks man, I have over 1000 main keywords and lots of secondaries so it's across many industries. I'm still a customer and not trying to bash the product just wish it was a bit better that's all.

Stripping other people's URLs would be great too, some seem to find their way in, and the platform I use has it's own bulk loading of articles and automatically adds http to any URL so it gives live links to these sites that I really don't want.
 
I used it the first month before the price went up. I'd say Tier 2 is fine. I used it for my trial site and found out I needed to counter check the article and get some stuff off. However, I still think it'll work fine for PBN as there are no issues with uniqueness and indexing.
 
Back
Top