Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

[Donovan405]

I received you email. Will send you the money ASAP.

Thanks! Great customer support, A really nice software, its worth every penny, and for sure will take the whole SEO software market soon.

 

[Themanhere]

When the software creates accounts, does it assign and use that same proxy to post to the account?

If so, would it be possible to include the proxy used to create an account in "profile" and the post in "link sets". Even having the proxy used in export options for profile / link set would be useful.

Basically, I'm wanting to avoid creating an account with 1 proxy, then having 5 other proxies create 5 posts. I like to pad-out premium sites like WordPress, Tumblr etc, I want to make them look legit. That means logging in manually and tweaking. So 6 different proxies could potentially be used to create the account, post and then manually alter in a single month. If the proxy used to create the profile was used consistently until it gets replaced, it may help draw less attention / flag up accounts for bans.

 

[neteater]

Hi mates,

What is the best indexer to used to Ranker X? I used Express Indexer for my campaign but it isn't effective. After finish the campaign , have only about 500 links on ahrefs.

Thanks!

Personally I use Elite Link Indexer

Thanks! Great customer support, A really nice software, its worth every penny, and for sure will take the whole SEO software market soon.

Thank you

When the software creates accounts, does it assign and use that same proxy to post to the account?

If so, would it be possible to include the proxy used to create an account in "profile" and the post in "link sets". Even having the proxy used in export options for profile / link set would be useful.

Basically, I'm wanting to avoid creating an account with 1 proxy, then having 5 other proxies create 5 posts. I like to pad-out premium sites like WordPress, Tumblr etc, I want to make them look legit. That means logging in manually and tweaking. So 6 different proxies could potentially be used to create the account, post and then manually alter in a single month. If the proxy used to create the profile was used consistently until it gets replaced, it may help draw less attention / flag up accounts for bans.

Yes,

RankerX uses the same proxy (which was used to create that account) for a same account when posting.

 

[Themanhere]

Yes,

RankerX uses the same proxy (which was used to create that account) for a same account when posting.

That's good to hear! Do you think it'd be possible to add the proxy to "link set" or "profile" or both exports? Just for those of us that manually tweak tier 1 links, which should really be everybody. Thanks

 

[danissa]

Personally I use Elite Link Indexer

Thank you for your suggestions, I will try it

 

[mtj85]

It seems I missed your email. Could you please let me know your username and PayPal email via PM please. Since you have not been able to use the software for 8 days I'll extend the subscription for 8 days. Thank you.

Issues resolved. Thank you for support.

 

[bekemew]

I have been working on a keyword for just short of two months now it was stuck on page positions 11 to 15. I did have this keyword on page one back on the first week Aug 2016. We had sale of two products per day for around a week each sales value $80. The keyword for the product has only 800 and local search per month high. I have 2 types of this product so 2 urls +money site.

Just sat down with a bootle of red wine with Iphone in hand and did a search on the keywords. position 3 first URL, position 3 in my 2nd URL and position 5 my home page.

Thank you for all your help. I will finish off that bottle of wine now.

 

[buckley]

I have been working on a keyword for just short of two months now it was stuck on page positions 11 to 15. I did have this keyword on page one back on the first week Aug 2016. We had sale of two products per day for around a week each sales value $80. The keyword for the product has only 800 and local search per month high. I have 2 types of this product so 2 urls +money site.

Just sat down with a bootle of red wine with Iphone in hand and did a search on the keywords. position 3 first URL, position 3 in my 2nd URL and position 5 my home page.

Thank you for all your help. I will finish off that bottle of wine now.

Congrats Sir, I'm stuck on page 2 of Google Search results. Can you share your SEO journey?

 

[duran1]

Have you any Life-Time Discount?

 

[bekemew]

Congrats Sir, I'm stuck on page 2 of Google Search results. Can you share your SEO journey?

I was sent a pm

 

[buckley]

I was sent a pm

I got it thank you!

 

[Lebowskii]

I was sent a pm

would love to see it myself.

 

[webhostingproviders]

I have been working on a keyword for just short of two months now it was stuck on page positions 11 to 15. I did have this keyword on page one back on the first week Aug 2016. We had sale of two products per day for around a week each sales value $80. The keyword for the product has only 800 and local search per month high. I have 2 types of this product so 2 urls +money site.

Just sat down with a bootle of red wine with Iphone in hand and did a search on the keywords. position 3 first URL, position 3 in my 2nd URL and position 5 my home page.

Thank you for all your help. I will finish off that bottle of wine now.

Can you please also share your journey with me - I love to rank too

 

[bekemew]

would love to see it myself.

Can you please also share your journey with me - I love to rank too

- This template is used for Create a New Accounts

- This template is used for Use Already Profiles

 

[Sieusc]

- This template is used for Create a New Accounts

- This template is used for Use Already Profiles

But why not created new profiles everytime? What are the benefits of using already profiles?

 

[bekemew]

But why not created new profiles everytime? What are the benefits of using already profiles?

If you're create new profile everytime - an article for a website only, it looks like a spammer. When you post 4-5(at least) unique articles on each web 2.0. And don't put the same number of articles on every web 2.0. Vary the number a bit. Similarly, do not set them to auto post on the same time or the same day of the week. The idea is to not leave any sort of a footprint. The more random your web 2.0s seem, the safer you will be. That's benefits of using already profiles

 

[Themanhere]

That's good to hear! Do you think it'd be possible to add the proxy to "link set" or "profile" or both exports? Just for those of us that manually tweak tier 1 links, which should really be everybody. Thanks

I just logged into a Tumblr account, and by chance came across the "Active Sessions", which shows the IP's / browser / location of anyone accessing the account.

It clearly shows "Chrome Windows 7" with a different IP each time a post was added to the account. So

Account created:
IL-Chicago, US
Proxy: 1**.3.***.1**
27 days ago
on Sep 20

NY-Buffalo, US
Proxy: 1**.***.9*.***
10 days ago
on Oct 7

NY-Buffalo, US
Proxy: 2*.**.***.1**
5 days ago
on Oct 12

This means RankerX is creating profiles with one proxy, then posting with a random proxy to the same account each time. Even if the profile is created outside of RankerX and imported, it should always pick 1 proxy and use that proxy consistently for a single profile (until it's replaced of course). FYI, my proxies have not been replaced, I've used the same batch since starting with RankerX, so this isn't a case of the software making substitutions.

This effectively means in a pool of 50 proxies, the creation of 10 profiles with 5 posts per profile, would expose all of those profiles to the same proxy at least once. This links all of the profiles together and things like this can lead to mass deletions if one profile goes down. I've tested on a few other Tumblrs that were definitely created via RankerX, and it's NOT using the same proxy to post as it did to create the profile.

I've got to be honest, this is really basic stuff. It's using the same version of Chrome and OS to create accounts, I'm going to assume other commonly tracked fingerprints are the same aswell. Although these are common and obfuscate to a point, depending on the sophistication fingerprint detection used, it's a little suspicious to have a few thousand RankerX users posting to the same platforms with the exact same fingerprint. A couple of hundred out of a million people with a similar fingerprint, fine. A few thousand starts to ring a few bell. Fingerprints should be based on common setups to blend and not hide, but there should be some variation in common setups i.e. browser used, windows version, operating system.

 

[Sieusc]

If you're create new profile everytime - an article for a website only, it looks like a spammer. When you post 4-5(at least) unique articles on each web 2.0. And don't put the same number of articles on every web 2.0. Vary the number a bit. Similarly, do not set them to auto post on the same time or the same day of the week. The idea is to not leave any sort of a footprint. The more random your web 2.0s seem, the safer you will be. That's benefits of using already profiles

Nice!!

 

[ankit03]

is there any one time payment option. I would like to give it a try for my adult website

 

[neteater]

I just logged into a Tumblr account, and by chance came across the "Active Sessions", which shows the IP's / browser / location of anyone accessing the account.

It clearly shows "Chrome Windows 7" with a different IP each time a post was added to the account. So

Account created:
IL-Chicago, US
Proxy: 1**.3.***.1**
27 days ago
on Sep 20

NY-Buffalo, US
Proxy: 1**.***.9*.***
10 days ago
on Oct 7

NY-Buffalo, US
Proxy: 2*.**.***.1**
5 days ago
on Oct 12

This means RankerX is creating profiles with one proxy, then posting with a random proxy to the same account each time. Even if the profile is created outside of RankerX and imported, it should always pick 1 proxy and use that proxy consistently for a single profile (until it's replaced of course). FYI, my proxies have not been replaced, I've used the same batch since starting with RankerX, so this isn't a case of the software making substitutions.

This effectively means in a pool of 50 proxies, the creation of 10 profiles with 5 posts per profile, would expose all of those profiles to the same proxy at least once. This links all of the profiles together and things like this can lead to mass deletions if one profile goes down. I've tested on a few other Tumblrs that were definitely created via RankerX, and it's NOT using the same proxy to post as it did to create the profile.

I've got to be honest, this is really basic stuff. It's using the same version of Chrome and OS to create accounts, I'm going to assume other commonly tracked fingerprints are the same aswell. Although these are common and obfuscate to a point, depending on the sophistication fingerprint detection used, it's a little suspicious to have a few thousand RankerX users posting to the same platforms with the exact same fingerprint. A couple of hundred out of a million people with a similar fingerprint, fine. A few thousand starts to ring a few bell. Fingerprints should be based on common setups to blend and not hide, but there should be some variation in common setups i.e. browser used, windows version, operating system.

No, RankerX always tries to reuse the proxies. The problem you mentioned was due to your proxies. Your proxies were not always working. RankerX checks the proxies every few minutes for alive proxies. So if a proxy is dead (maybe temporarily), it will not be used any more until it is alive again. So if the last proxy, which was used for an account, is dead, RankerX will get a new proxy for that account. That's why you saw several IP addresses logged.