Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter CoreClub
- Start date
-
- Tags
- brand builder pbn
- Status
CoreClub
Regular Member
- Aug 13, 2012
- 226
- 42
I think this is the last review copy that's been claimed, let's see where it takes you!
CoreClub
Regular Member
- Aug 13, 2012
- 226
- 42
Let's see how far it takes you!I decided to make it even more serious with ranking graph.
Start Positions:
Fear2403
Power Member
- Dec 21, 2014
- 699
- 97
All kw go up very well.Thank OP again.I got a review copy from OP.My 4 month old site mainly target 4 KW(medium-high competition) but i request only 2 Kw as anchor text for better result.Here is current ranking :
I will update ranking after 30 day.
Magic32
Power Member
- Apr 11, 2012
- 519
- 176
Today received a report. First impression:
1. Work done for 6 days after order. That's pretty fast especially when compared with similar services which usually delay turnaround time.
2. Posts that are already indexed placed in top20 in Google (searching by full title), sometimes higher than some big sites, it's good result. A slight negative that titles for all 10 posts very similar, better making it more different.
3. Only 3 post from 10 now indexing, so it's early to see results, but I want suggest you make some improvements for your sites... I check 3 indexed posts and I see that all 3 sites using main domain without www, so you have 301 from www to just http:///site.com, but I was surprised when I see that metrics for 2 sites much better with www! For example:
Site #1 in my report:
without www: pa37 da29 cf4 tf3
with www: pa40 da29 cf33 tf5
Site #4 in my report:
without www: pa29 da22 cf0 tf0
with www: pa35 da22 cf28 tf2
So, it's obvious that it is better to use this sites with www. I check only 3 sites, I think same situation with others, so please check and make changes if you agree.
p.s.
Check more sites, and a little confused... maybe I something don't understand, so just explain me, why using site without www if metrics are:
site #9
without www: pa1 da15 tf0 cf0
with www pa19 da15 tf0 cf22
Or it's just what you explain in preview and version with www have same or much better metrics but you locked crawlers from Moz and Majestic and that's why we can't see it?
Last edited:
CoreClub
Regular Member
- Aug 13, 2012
- 226
- 42
Thanks for your incredibly detailed review! The www redirects to http://site.com so I'm doing both //site and www. for variety.
Also, if you're using majestic for your data research on the domains, you may find this blog post very interesting. (TLDR: Majestic is far inferior to Ahrefs when trying to make domain decisions)
Another thing I can say to shed some light on this is that I have stopped using "proprietary" metrics like pa da tf cf rd long ago because they're not very accurate and don't help you make good decisions at all.
Review:
I gave the OP 3 keywords that were relatively difficult and told him to distribute the 10 posts across the 3 KWs.
The results have been decent, with some movement across each KW. The main KW I gave moved up around 10 places (it keeps jumping around) but that's a pretty good rank increase, considering it's only 10 posts.
Each site is nicely designed and I like that there are no footer links going to the Wordpress theme like most people's PBNs do. There is a logo/header for each PBN and I like the variation in the sidebar placement.
The articles are definitely of very good quality and not like you would see in most PBNs.
The only thing I didn't like was the lack of page variation. The contact, privacy policy and about pages typically had the same title, which could be changed. I also saw some sites with the same theme, but with different colours and changed up a bit. Personally, I like my PBNs to have completely different themes so that could be improved in my opinion.
Overall though, some good quality PBN links with a decent backlink profile and excellent content. The seller's communication is also very good, and he will get back to you quite quickly if you ever have a question.
I gave the OP 3 keywords that were relatively difficult and told him to distribute the 10 posts across the 3 KWs.
The results have been decent, with some movement across each KW. The main KW I gave moved up around 10 places (it keeps jumping around) but that's a pretty good rank increase, considering it's only 10 posts.
Each site is nicely designed and I like that there are no footer links going to the Wordpress theme like most people's PBNs do. There is a logo/header for each PBN and I like the variation in the sidebar placement.
The articles are definitely of very good quality and not like you would see in most PBNs.
The only thing I didn't like was the lack of page variation. The contact, privacy policy and about pages typically had the same title, which could be changed. I also saw some sites with the same theme, but with different colours and changed up a bit. Personally, I like my PBNs to have completely different themes so that could be improved in my opinion.
Overall though, some good quality PBN links with a decent backlink profile and excellent content. The seller's communication is also very good, and he will get back to you quite quickly if you ever have a question.
CoreClub
Regular Member
- Aug 13, 2012
- 226
- 42
Thank you for the review!
webmasterbd
Elite Member
- Dec 2, 2009
- 5,393
- 3,004
I am interested,please send me few samples & coupon code if you have.
CoreClub
Regular Member
- Aug 13, 2012
- 226
- 42
Will send in a few!
CoreClub
Regular Member
- Aug 13, 2012
- 226
- 42
PM'd you with sample sites and discount info
- Status