Really disappointed with SEnuke TNG

[Daniss Jasmer]

Hi guys,

I bought the lifetime of Senuke TNG when It was released. First of all the very first version which came up was full of bugs. After a few months, some bug is resolved but I'm still really disappointed with Senuke TNG. This is what happened:

More specific : http://recordit.co/SjefE7IOi2

This is Premium Social Network? It was terrible

Senuke was basically the only software out of the big names. $1997 for a stuff ...

 

[mynameisfrankenstein]

I remember when I first got into IM - I had no money, found a little cracked version of senuke and when I watched it play... Wow the excitement being a young kid seeing all that control and automation.

Sorry that memory came back to me watching your video! /nostalgia.

 

[Daniss Jasmer]

I remember when I first got into IM - I had no money, found a little cracked version of senuke and when I watched it play... Wow the excitement being a young kid seeing all that control and automation.

Sorry that memory came back to me watching your video! /nostalgia.

ahaha. I just tested Account Creation project(a small test). If I run Wizards to setup for the all projects, I will take too much time.

 

[Jeffersontalks]

MIght as well just stick with GSA as it is cheaper. Nevertheless, these tools are no longer that effective for SEO after so many Google updates (my opinion not a fact so please do not trash me yet). I would rather spend money on contents than to spend time with link building and onsite SEO ( with mobile responsiveness).

 

[Daniss Jasmer]

MIght as well just stick with GSA as it is cheaper. Nevertheless, these tools are no longer that effective for SEO after so many Google updates (my opinion not a fact so please do not trash me yet). I would rather spend money on contents than to spend time with link building and onsite SEO ( with mobile responsiveness).

I agree with your comment. However, Backlinks without the spammy obvious footprint still plays the important factor to rank up for medium competition up. I also did some simple tests. 2 new websites, 1 with backlinks, the other no backlink but with more detail on-site SEO. Guess who rank higher? the answer is obvious. Backlink still rules in 2016

If you are really interested in doing things manually you will definetly lag behind. In fact, You need some sort of SEO tool to help cut down the work. Manual is the best way YES and the most labour intensive. However, just like in gardening to cut your lawn you need a tool, be it manual mower (used decades ago) or an electric or petrol powered mower. You still need a tool.

Some great stuff:
1. Scrapebox
2. GSA Search Engine Ranker
3. Zennoposter(Great for PBNs and mass posting)
4. WordAI, Article Forge (Best Word Spinner on the market)
5. RankerX(has a lot of potential for Tier1 links)
6. The Best Article Spinner(for bulk spinning)
7. Buyproxies(best IMO)
8. ProRankTracker(really good for the price)
9. Wufoo(Easy checkout system for SEO selling)

 

[pelangi]

ouch, very terrible,
let me cry for your wasted money...

 

[DunDidIt2X]

GSA is the best software for this..... some off the best money I spent in all these years.... And it was actually pretty cheap app, that actually works the best.

 

[JustUs]

When SeNuke TNG came out the first thing I did was find a cracked version to examine and test. After both, I made the decision that SeNuke was all hype and no bite. The same was true of XCr. The initial version of SeNuke was good, hell I still have pages ranking that were ranked with the first version. That version I paid the subscription for.

A new interface on TNG does not make it a good program, and I can run TNG with the XCr interface, but why bother?

 

[jimbobo2779]

One consistent with SENuke has always been it's bugs. For what is essentially a software made out of browser automation it should never be that buggy.

 

[IBuildStuff]

When SeNuke TNG came out the first thing I did was find a cracked version to examine and test. After both, I made the decision that SeNuke was all hype and no bite. The same was true of XCr. The initial version of SeNuke was good, hell I still have pages ranking that were ranked with the first version. That version I paid the subscription for.

A new interface on TNG does not make it a good program, and I can run TNG with the XCr interface, but why bother?

I assumed you can code. I've never understood why people like you and others that roam this forum that are coders don't try to compete with projects like RankerX , FCS networker, Turbo submitter, SENuke. If you really think about it, most of these projects spend their time on literally always updating their list of web 2.0 properties code, and miss updating the core of their product. It would be a lot easier if these software makers would open up a way to add these web 2.0 properties as modules that anybody can code, and the creators to concentrate on the core aspect and bugs. Instead, they are continually updating modules and taking away from fixing their product which remains unchanged for a long time without any new features but more web 2.0 properties.

 

[Jeffersontalks]

I agree with your comment. However, Backlinks without the spammy obvious footprint still plays the important factor to rank up for medium competition up. I also did some simple tests. 2 new websites, 1 with backlinks, the other no backlink but with more detail on-site SEO. Guess who rank higher? the answer is obvious. Backlink still rules in 2016

If you are really interested in doing things manually you will definetly lag behind. In fact, You need some sort of SEO tool to help cut down the work. Manual is the best way YES and the most labour intensive. However, just like in gardening to cut your lawn you need a tool, be it manual mower (used decades ago) or an electric or petrol powered mower. You still need a tool.

Some great stuff:
1. Scrapebox
2. GSA Search Engine Ranker
3. Zennoposter(Great for PBNs and mass posting)
4. WordAI, Article Forge (Best Word Spinner on the market)
5. RankerX(has a lot of potential for Tier1 links)
6. The Best Article Spinner(for bulk spinning)
7. Buyproxies(best IMO)
8. ProRankTracker(really good for the price)
9. Wufoo(Easy checkout system for SEO selling)

I personally find that if you have quality content that fits demand and share it across social network, you get backlinks naturally as real audience share your link around. Fact is that quality links are important than quantities of links if you want to have long term success with SEO link building. Link building cost has been raising through the years and success/ revenue against link building is dropping after every Google updates which is getting more and more frequent.

Nowadays I do not bother about link building anymore but Google still send traffic to my new sites as I am posting new contents every 30 min. I have tried article forge but find that the cost is not worth it

I agree with your comment. However, Backlinks without the spammy obvious footprint still plays the important factor to rank up for medium competition up. I also did some simple tests. 2 new websites, 1 with backlinks, the other no backlink but with more detail on-site SEO. Guess who rank higher? the answer is obvious. Backlink still rules in 2016

If you are really interested in doing things manually you will definetly lag behind. In fact, You need some sort of SEO tool to help cut down the work. Manual is the best way YES and the most labour intensive. However, just like in gardening to cut your lawn you need a tool, be it manual mower (used decades ago) or an electric or petrol powered mower. You still need a tool.

Some great stuff:
1. Scrapebox
2. GSA Search Engine Ranker
3. Zennoposter(Great for PBNs and mass posting)
4. WordAI, Article Forge (Best Word Spinner on the market)
5. RankerX(has a lot of potential for Tier1 links)
6. The Best Article Spinner(for bulk spinning)
7. Buyproxies(best IMO)
8. ProRankTracker(really good for the price)
9. Wufoo(Easy checkout system for SEO selling)

A bit of input on your view. Manaul does not mean that I will lag behind. Between a sniper and a guy wielding a machine gun without obvious target, I rather be the formal. Whether manual or automation with bots, the person behind the software is the most crucial component. I have seen too many products being sold here whereby ultimately it is the person behind that matters. Example, I saw many fancy link building tools nowadays but what actually gives me sales? I just put an ad on Google and spend less than $2 and I get a sale with a profit of $20+ dollars. I spend hundreds of dollars buying tools when I could be making money with the time and money during these period of so call link building.

 

[JustUs]

I assumed you can code. I've never understood why people like you and others that roam this forum that are coders don't try to compete with projects like RankerX , FCS networker, Turbo submitter, SENuke. If you really think about it, most of these projects spend their time on literally always updating their list of web 2.0 properties code, and miss updating the core of their product. It would be a lot easier if these software makers would open up a way to add these web 2.0 properties as modules that anybody can code, and the creators to concentrate on the core aspect and bugs. Instead, they are continually updating modules and taking away from fixing their product which remains unchanged for a long time without any new features but more web 2.0 properties.

The answer to what you do not understand is that it is more time efficient to use programs that others write rather than recreating the wheel.

As far as your assumption that we do not code our own solutions, that is a false assumption because many of us do. Often we do not share our solutions because a secret is best kept by one.

Edit add:
While some minor bugs will creep in, the best way to keep them out is to use incremental builds and constantly test what you have written before. Some programmers like Sven at GSA does this, many other coders do not. You can tell the difference from the program. Some programmers, such as SeNuke, only want your money.

 

[IBuildStuff]

The answer to what you do not understand is that it is more time efficient to use programs that others write rather than recreating the wheel.

As far as your assumption that we do not code our own solutions, that is a false assumption because many of us do. Often we do not share our solutions because a secret is best kept by one.

Edit add:
While some minor bugs will creep in, the best way to keep them out is to use incremental builds and constantly test what you have written before. Some programmers like Sven at GSA does this, many other coders do not. You can tell the difference from the program. Some programmers, such as SeNuke, only want your money.

Fair enough, it seems that you are replying from the perspective of someone building tools for the whole purpose of using them personally. I can see your point, and understand it 100% when it comes to not recreating the wheel.

However, I think what you might not grasp is that those developers like SeNuke, and the others SEO tools makers, do not actually use their own tools for their own campaigns. They make more money concentrating on building the tools than using it, so as a matter of fact those guys do not care about keeping secrets or creating their own tools for their own usage. They care about building SEO products to sell, but I guess you are right as there are different kind of coders in this game. Some coders are just building their own simple tools with simple scripts, maybe they add a GUI here and there, and these coders do not fit the 1% of all SEO coders who are in it to sell their tools.

Thanks a lot man for explaining your perspective, I never really thought it about that. Especially with keeping their best kept secret.

 

[Daniss Jasmer]

I personally find that if you have quality content that fits demand and share it across social network, you get backlinks naturally as real audience share your link around. Fact is that quality links are important than quantities of links if you want to have long term success with SEO link building. Link building cost has been raising through the years and success/ revenue against link building is dropping after every Google updates which is getting more and more frequent.

Nowadays I do not bother about link building anymore but Google still send traffic to my new sites as I am posting new contents every 30 min. I have tried article forge but find that the cost is not worth it

A bit of input on your view. Manaul does not mean that I will lag behind. Between a sniper and a guy wielding a machine gun without obvious target, I rather be the formal. Whether manual or automation with bots, the person behind the software is the most crucial component. I have seen too many products being sold here whereby ultimately it is the person behind that matters. Example, I saw many fancy link building tools nowadays but what actually gives me sales? I just put an ad on Google and spend less than $2 and I get a sale with a profit of $20+ dollars. I spend hundreds of dollars buying tools when I could be making money with the time and money during these period of so call link building.

I'm a guy wielding sniper and machine gun(I'm using both). . as I mentioned previously, You need some sort of SEO tool to help cut down the work. Manual is the best way YES and the most labour intensive.

For an example:
1. Create tumblr accounts from RankerX
2. Login manually, Redesign Template
3. Automatic publish articles.
http://tksstgiftguide.tumblr.com/

Creating and managing multiple websites is no easy. but If you know the combination of the both, I will not spend too much time which equivalent effect.

 

[JustUs]

Fair enough, it seems that you are replying from the perspective of someone building tools for the whole purpose of using them personally. I can see your point, and understand it 100% when it comes to not recreating the wheel.

However, I think what you might not grasp is that those developers like SeNuke, and the others SEO tools makers, do not actually use their own tools for their own campaigns. They make more money concentrating on building the tools than using it, so as a matter of fact those guys do not care about keeping secrets or creating their own tools for their own usage. They care about building SEO products to sell, but I guess you are right as there are different kind of coders in this game. Some coders are just building their own simple tools with simple scripts, maybe they add a GUI here and there, and these coders do not fit the 1% of all SEO coders who are in it to sell their tools.

Thanks a lot man for explaining your perspective, I never really thought it about that. Especially with keeping their best kept secret.

Again, you might be mistaken in your outlook. The following is a program that I have been working on for some time. The intention is to provide a free alternative to GScraper for those that choose to use it, or that cannot afford other scrapers (though Scrapebox is very affordable). Cant afford? $57 US may be [Un] affordable to some outside the country. When this will be ready? I don't know. I also have to eat.

 

[Jeffersontalks]

I'm a guy wielding sniper and machine gun(I'm using both). . as I mentioned previously, You need some sort of SEO tool to help cut down the work. Manual is the best way YES and the most labour intensive.

For an example:
1. Create tumblr accounts from RankerX
2. Login manually, Redesign Template
3. Automatic publish articles.
http://tksstgiftguide.tumblr.com/

Creating and managing multiple websites is no easy. but If you know the combination of the both, I will not spend too much time which equivalent effect.

Agree but like i say, the tools are only as good as the person wielding it. Most people simply uses a machine guy without the fundamental of how to shoot properly. Alot of newbies upon seeing your post is going to go blindly in to buy these tools. And after three months they will see no returns and start blaming the tools. This is unfair to the developer of these tools.

 

[IBuildStuff]

Again, you might be mistaken in your outlook. The following is a program that I have been working on for some time. The intention is to provide a free alternative to GScraper for those that choose to use it, or that cannot afford other scrapers (though Scrapebox is very affordable). Cant afford? $57 US may be affordable to some outside the country. When this will be ready? I don't know. I also have to eat.

That looks really nice! Haha yeah everybody does need to eat. Just out of curiosity, do you have a version system in mind that you will be using for your product? Are you basing your version number of semver 2.0? Or are you just making it up ?

I mostly build dashboards , so perhaps once I look into the scene a little bit more maybe I can make something similar to RankerX. I'm not sure, I also have to eat as well and I have other priorities on mind. However, I'm right there with you, sometimes the current stuff available is too expensive and not affordable for non-first-world citizens(I hope I don't sound to condescending using that word). Sorry, if I stepped on your toes or winded you up. I was just more interested to see the view from an outsider. Thanks again for your response, I appreciated.

 

[Daniss Jasmer]

Agree but like i say, the tools are only as good as the person wielding it. Most people simply uses a machine guy without the fundamental of how to shoot properly. Alot of newbies upon seeing your post is going to go blindly in to buy these tools. And after three months they will see no returns and start blaming the tools. This is unfair to the developer of these tools.

You're absolutely right. The tools are only as good as the person wielding it

 

[cashcorp]

Personally, I quit using SENUKE years ago - and after playing with TNG for about ten minutes walked away. If you need bulk 2.0s, buy them, outsource the building, or use something like Zennoposter/templates to get your dirty work done.

Not to mention the price.

 

[AleeGS]

What a scam...