Spun articles on PBNs

[Lone Wolf]

You fucked up with the quote but I got your message.

If you would have read my entire post instead of just the first few lines you would have seen that I later on said that spun and generated content works just fine, but you obliviously can't use the same spintax article an infinite amount of times because uniqueness will dilute.

So let me repeat: spun/generated content works just fine. As long as it's semi readable (doesn't need to make sense, just contain your keywords a few times) and unique you're good to go. There is no need for handwritten content, although it might (just might, there are lots of other factors that weigh in as well) save you in case of a manual review, Google can't/won't algorithmically flag generated/spun content from what I've seen.

 

[bilbo]

You fucked up with the quote but I got your message.

If you would have read my entire post instead of just the first few lines you would have seen that I later on said that spun and generated content works just fine, but you obliviously can't use the same spintax article an infinite amount of times because uniqueness will dilute.

So let me repeat: spun/generated content works just fine. As long as it's semi readable (doesn't need to make sense, just contain your keywords a few times) and unique you're good to go. There is no need for handwritten content, although it might (just might, there are lots of other factors that weigh in as well) save you in case of a manual review, Google can't/won't algorithmically flag generated/spun content from what I've seen.

no worries m8, I do agree with your comments to some degree however there is spun content and there is spun content. I am pretty sure 300 articles spun from 1 seed and then posted would get flagged. I am making assumptions based on the original OP post. I am not arguing the toss over grammar or readability etc.