new Russian technology

@tar729 you are the one... i will open JV and i am sure no matter how expensive is the threatment in Russia , we will cover it
 
Advertise on BHW
Hi Tar. Thank you for sharing your ideas! I believe what you are saying. So for a site like CNBC - if they have 2 links going out, those links are not same weight. Depending on relevance, one link maybe weight higher than the other. So people are buying links but not understand that the link might not be relevant to their site, so the weight of the link is wasted.
Question: What is the best way to increase a rank for Main Site? Make lots of small sites and link it to main site to its correct page for relevancy?
 
I've summarised your original post. Is this how it works?
1. 3 Main Website - Satellite 1 (S1); Satellite 2 (S2) and Customer (C).
2. Make 4 web pages (YB2) - all 4 web pages are on different places.
3. S1 and S2 have same keyword in homepage title.
4. S1 uses keywords of non buying keywords.
5. S2 uses keywords for buying keywords (commerical intent)
6. S1 has 4 YB2 pages linking to S1 homepage
7. S2 has 4 links going out, each link goes to YB2 page.
8. S1 Links to S2.
9. S2 links to C
Is that the way it works? So each time the search engine updates the relevancy, it keeps increasing the ranking because the linking of all the sites creates a positive feedback loop that keeps increasing the rank at each search engine update?
 
seoheroo said:
I've summarised your original post. Is this how it works?
1. 3 Main Website - Satellite 1 (S1); Satellite 2 (S2) and Customer (C).
2. Make 4 web pages (YB2) - all 4 web pages are on different places.
3. S1 and S2 have same keyword in homepage title.
4. S1 uses keywords of non buying keywords.
5. S2 uses keywords for buying keywords (commerical intent)
6. S1 has 4 YB2 pages linking to S1 homepage
7. S2 has 4 links going out, each link goes to YB2 page.
8. S1 Links to S2.
9. S2 links to C
Is that the way it works? So each time the search engine updates the relevancy, it keeps increasing the ranking because the linking of all the sites creates a positive feedback loop that keeps increasing the rank at each search engine update?
Click to expand...
I've been while absent Good point given here seoheroo,Please setp by step explain the strategy to all understand bceuase this starting to confuse all even me although I'm expert in this field.
 
TayaX said:
This thread has been dragged on so long. OP is selling his service obviously. how come this hasnt ben banned already ?
Click to expand...
because I'm not selling anything
 
tar729 said:
Well, because I am a specialist of algorithms. I sell my service, I don't run some YouTube blog. How do you imagine me ranking myself on YouTube? Make videos of cats and rank them there? I sell my services to a limited amount of people because it's a quality product, those kind of people don't care whether I rank myself or not on YouTube. They care about my report of which links should they build and which should they disavow. Which links make hem waste their money and which links make it enough to be able to waste it.
The videos are BTW specifically made for my group to explain to people how detailed SEO actually works. And that one link can defeat thousands.
Click to expand...

tar729 said:
because I'm not selling anything
Click to expand...
 
here I talk about technology and not selling anything
 
I appreciate his efforts to make things clear. Dont ban him i guess still more to come. Tar Do you think @seoheroo is correct.?
 
http://joxi.ru/l2ZlJooCBOkErJ

"tradukka/translate

Why Google removed the Page Rank and why we cannot trust PA DA/TF/CF

Actually, Google and said why he did it: "PR ceased to reflect the reality of the situation." It is true, but not all. The fact of the matter is that PR has a relationship with the quality of the page is not comprehensive and is the only metric of its reference and trafikovoj popularity. Of course, the formula was changed and Page Rank Google tried to take into account not only the quantity but also the quality of the links, based on the same quality features pages from which these links were standing. But metric in evaluating the quality of the page and links from them never attended analysis of the semantics of these pages. This incomplete soon began bringing harm to the entire search engine, because optimizers have to PR when buying links, believing that the higher the PR the better link and more expensive stands, respectively. I.e. optimizers are not perceived and still do not see the relevance of a document as a major sign of Ancor to quality links. For them it still is of secondary importance. Of course, every possible endeavor optimizer buy relevant link, but the native perspective on this issue is very different from the view of a webmaster. To understand what is at stake and what is the difference between these estimates, I recommend you take your keyword Ancora and the intervention site search page to determine the position of the page in the extradition. If this page appears in this extradition TOP1, then we can talk about what this page your Ancor really is relevant. But if it is to stay away, it will mean lower your page relevancy Ancor. This would mean that your link to this page doesn't Ancor is a relevant reference and will most likely be classified Sars as a spamnaâ link. In assessing the quality of the links Google looks not at the absolute importance of relevancy Ancora page, and on the relative within the entire site. This need to understand and know. But the eye you it never define. You may not like a machine to evaluate all the pages on the site at the same time! As a result, you will feel that you are buying a good reference on this page and, if the page will and a high PR, then you'll appreciate this link as very good. But in fact, it may well be for Google spamnoj!..."

better? clear anything?
 
Last edited:
its a relevancy link pyramid type scenario.

so site 1 is for the customer, its linked back to site 2 which is highly relevant,

site two is linked back from site 3 which is also highly relevant.

both site 2 and 3 are reinforced further by highly relevant miniature sites

to take things one step further then start yammering the hell out of the power up sites with your tools.

transistor, god knows its lost on me but im sure its not a secret device ruling the tinterweb.

I was going to power up the thread with sarcasm but I can see the guy is trying to help but is struggling wit English.

so a relevancy pyramid wich ultimately will look a bit like a double tier PBN if im not mistaken.
 
rob1977 said:
its a relevancy link pyramid type scenario.

so site 1 is for the customer, its linked back to site 2 which is highly relevant,

site two is linked back from site 3 which is also highly relevant.

both site 2 and 3 are reinforced further by highly relevant miniature sites

to take things one step further then start yammering the hell out of the power up sites with your tools.

transistor, god knows its lost on me but im sure its not a secret device ruling the tinterweb.

I was going to power up the thread with sarcasm but I can see the guy is trying to help but is struggling wit English.

so a relevancy pyramid wich ultimately will look a bit like a double tier PBN if im not mistaken.
Click to expand...
please move your question to another thread at the link above.
I find it difficult to control two of the thread.
 
Can you get to the point, so basically you're saying relevant links are better and those links that are clicked on more carry more weight?
 
rob1977 said:
its a relevancy link pyramid type scenario.

so site 1 is for the customer, its linked back to site 2 which is highly relevant,

site two is linked back from site 3 which is also highly relevant.

both site 2 and 3 are reinforced further by highly relevant miniature sites

to take things one step further then start yammering the hell out of the power up sites with your tools.

transistor, god knows its lost on me but im sure its not a secret device ruling the tinterweb.

I was going to power up the thread with sarcasm but I can see the guy is trying to help but is struggling wit English.

so a relevancy pyramid wich ultimately will look a bit like a double tier PBN if im not mistaken.
Click to expand...

I speak russian and what he is trying to tell is that apperently you can somehow keep switching ranks or something of two websites like a loop or somthin or black hat shit

tar729 said:
please move your question to another thread at the link above.
I find it difficult to control two of the thread.
Click to expand...

Which post the one from BHS?
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top