SANDBOXED ?"WELL WORTH READING !" "Simple SEO With Google Sniper Tactics

keith6andco

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
318
Reaction score
440
I'm gonna make this as short as I can - for those of you who followed the original thread..

I enjoyeD 1,2,3,4,5th on page one for over a month.

Recently I got my hands on SE NUKE for free

So - I thought I would do another test, on another site I had, using a dot info instaed of the succesful dot net. Being a sucker for new things I put the dot net site through SE NUKE as well

GUESS WHATS HAPPENED - BOTH SITES HAVE EITHER sandboxed !

tHE DOT NET SITE IS NOWHERE TO BE SEEN - PREVIOUSLY # 3 AND FOR FOR TWO KEYWORD VARIATIONS AND THE DOT INFO SITE HAS GONE AS WELL - PREVIOUSLY A # 3 ON PAGE 1

So - Does se nuke work ?

I dont know - I guess it does. It DID do all my submissions - I checked all the accounts. It DID create and validate throwaway emails - YES - it performed MARVELOUSLY - and did ALL that se NUKE is supposed to

But was it TOO much ?

This COULD be just co-incidence - I could just be paranoid about the BIG GOOGLE - but - seriously - if it IS co-incidence then its a HELL of a big one

thats all for now

(AND Yes - SE NUKE IS FREE - Yes it is a FULL working version - no it does NOT need an email or password to loggin - NO I CANNOT give it to you here for free because it is on the DO NOT SHARE list and NO I wont spend all day answering every PM I get in regards to being able to supply it for you and NO I Won't supply it to anyone else. I AM NOT GOING TO TELL YOU WHERE YOU CAN GET IT)

But . . . .

I DID find a really useful source of ALL SORTS OF"GOODIES":)

HERE :

Code:
http://xtremedll.blogspot.com/search/label/SEO%20Tools

Cheers
 
WOW - great link there chap !. That'll be another afternoon wasted then trawling through all that stuff :cool:. Thanks
 
Thanks mate :)

does anyone have other links for the stompernet dvd's?

thanks guys

Graham
 
can some1 confirm this about SENuked? does it really gets ur site sandboxed?? :|
 
You mean that google is going to sandboxing every website that using this technique?

Dangerous toy then...
 
The way google is going these days, you only have to blink and you're flat on your face in the sandbox. They do it to all my new sites. I have just come to accept that to know whether or not you have been successful in the google game, you need to wait at least 6 months.

The problem is, some sites never emerge from the sandbox, theres no way of knowing. The solution is to make a lot of sites at once.

As for SEnuke, I think it could well sandbox you. Google is extremely sensitive to the signs of unnatural growth. That said, make lots of sites and try your luck.
 
I have SENuke and use it all the time. I have never had a problem with the supposed "sandbox" or de-indexing by Google.

Maybe your sites are just doing the Google dance since they are always updating. Plus, with your use of SENuke, you will have all sort of backlinks coming to your site(s) depending on how you used it. So this could cause your sites to temporarily be moved around.

Also, SENuke is great for building a "natural" type of link structure for any site. You just have to make sure you use it right. If you have the full working latest version, then you should watch the videos and read the forum posts there. Great stuff in there.

And finally, if you have a cracked/nulled, or any type of free version...the software may seem to run smoothly, but it may very well not be doing you much good. The SENuke owners are very hardcore about making their software work only for their paying members. That is one of the reasons why they release so many updates. The free versions don't seem to be effective. I used to use a free version and wasn't getting many results at all. So I decided to get the PRO version. Once I did, everything worked like a charm and I started seeing results fast.
 
oh man i just wanted to implement senuke. thanks for the warning but i don't know what to believe
 
Thanks Guys for all the great comments

This post was not supposed to be about SE Nuke - more about being sanboxed

For those interested the version I am using is 4.65 and it has gone and created all the caaounts etc at all the places like rss, social BM etc etc so I don't think there is a faul with the software but I do think Google does not like rapid population of any site spread over so much of the net - I think this is SE nukes down fall - maybe it is jut TOO effective - I dont know - thankyou @Yukinari for youir comments - appreciated and I will keep trying
 
Google doesn't like a shit load of links being thrown at a new site, especially if it is YOUR OWN site. If you are throwing a bunch of links pointing to YOUR OWN site in very little time, Google may look at this as a red flag - especially if you don't make any attempt to make your linking look "natural".

That is why I prefer using authority web 2.0 sites initially because Google already views these sites as authority sites. So you will have a much better chance of getting content to stick in Google. Not to mention indexed faster than your own site.

If the campaign proves profitable, ramp it up, and then move to your own domain.
 
good stuff, and thanks for the info on SE Nuke, anyone had a sucsess using this? I've only ever seen reports of it not working or getting sites banned, never inbetween lol
 
anyone having starting problems with the new toy they may have found (the one I am not allowed to mentin here ) this is all I did to get it going

If you follow the instructions from where you got it from, run Wamp server FIRST, then open the program. Go to the options tab (lower right corner). Click that - Go to the top tool bar and scroll along to the registration tab. - enter a valid email address and a user name and you should be in. This is all I did and it worked beaut.
 
Google doesn't like a shit load of links being thrown at a new site, especially if it is YOUR OWN site. If you are throwing a bunch of links pointing to YOUR OWN site in very little time, Google may look at this as a red flag - especially if you don't make any attempt to make your linking look "natural".

That is why I prefer using authority web 2.0 sites initially because Google already views these sites as authority sites. So you will have a much better chance of getting content to stick in Google. Not to mention indexed faster than your own site.

If the campaign proves profitable, ramp it up, and then move to your own domain.

Is there a way to use SEnuke so it looks more "natural" to google. Im thinking of using senuke for my own business site (Im a local inground pool contractor) and if my site gets sandboxed it would kill us as the internet has done wonders for our business. Should I risk it?
 
Is there a way to use SEnuke so it looks more "natural" to google. Im thinking of using senuke for my own business site (Im a local inground pool contractor) and if my site gets sandboxed it would kill us as the internet has done wonders for our business. Should I risk it?

I think too many people are confused as to what SENuke is. SENuke IS NOT meant to be a BH Tool out of the box. It can be used as one, but it is not meant to be that way.

It is a tool designed to get all the tedious tasks of marketing done in a fraction of the time it normally takes. Using SENuke in a normal way to build links is fine and can be "natural". Just add variations to your links and anchor texts, space your submissions out, etc. All common sense stuff.

Adding links to your site doesn't mean you're doing anything BH.
 
Yes, this thread confirms what I've always thought to be the case. You must be very careful with SEnuke or with will get bitch-slapped by G very fast. However, the basic process of SEnuke I know from first hand experience is solid (i.e niche research, web 2.0 submission w/back links targeted for keyword, bookmarking with targeted keywords, etc.)

So, the question I've always had: Is SEnuke work the ridiculous price of $127/month? I have to give a qualified NO, except under this situation:

You have a ton of sites that you are about to throw up and need to build a LITTLE link juice for each one. This assumes that you've already done all your market research before the clock starts ticking and your money is being ciphoned by the SENuke people whilst you do careful research (i.e. none of this will work without proper and careful research). You can do good niche research without SENuke, hands-down.

However, bottom line, I have found that outsourcing this same process(submissions, account creations, etc) to Indians, Philipinos, or whomever is by far the most cost effective way to go and also I get much better result with by-hand submissions. (Why the by-hand works better, I have a good guess, but in theory bot or by-hand submission should work equally well.)

Trust me, you can get a lot of bookmarks, posts, and other submissions done with $127 month ad budget at GAF.

There are people I know who will swear by SEnuke, but they also are using it in conjunction with other tools like Xrumer.

BY ITSELF, SENuke is a waste of money.

I disagree with some of your post.

I only use SENuke. Never touched XRumer.

$127/mo is nothing compared to what you will make back if you know what you're doing as an internet marketer. I made back close to 4x my monthly payment in a matter of days.

And SENuke can build you tons of link juice and authority all on it's own in minutes a day.

Sure you can spend $127 on outsourcing and get some good results. But you have to first find reliable people, make sure they know what they are doing(especially if you're doing many submissions; this will require proxy use and still multiple accounts unless you want to hire a huge team), keep them updated on your backlinking plans, etc,etc etc.

With the time you spend doing all that, you could have multiple sites ranked in Google and making you money.

I prefer SENuke because it's more powerful than any other tool, more powerful than outsourcing, and I control what's going on.
 
Back
Top