PBN's - from the diagram which is better - thoughts please

[Slyeagle]

I'm interested to know the communities thoughts on which PBN set up would work best

 

[pseudonym]

#1 is for pbn's. #2 is for tiered link building aka web 2.0's... though there are people doing the 2.0 thing with pbn's

 

[Mr Wonderful]

The first option. This allows you to use your PBNs for linking to multiple properties. With the second set up you would't want to link to another money site later on with PBN 1, 5 and 6 since they are now interlinked. Your PBNs are too valuable for tiered linkbuilding.

 

[edgaro160]

Number 2 is how I have ranked a number of sites.

It's also safer if you have to remove anything as well, so I would advise going with that one.

 

[luhasr]

I Agree with first one because it will create more diversity.

 

[Stonemate]

A pbn is expensive and takes time and effort to set up. Setup number 1 is the best 100%, cant see any reason to do the setup nr2. Better do web2.0s as ur tier 2 then ^^

 

[The SEO]

Always with no. 1

 

[hootsparta]

I recommend No.1. It's totally safe to your website.
And, I have ranked a couple of sites from this method.

No.2 also I tried but, I used tier 2 "web 2.0 + guest posting" combination.

 

[arunraj.88]

I always go with NO .1

 

[PixelMathis]

some webmasters/bloggers are currently telling everyone to follow the 2nd model which is crap. Always follow the 1 diagram.

 

[Slyeagle]

some webmasters/bloggers are currently telling everyone to follow the 2nd model which is crap. Always follow the 1 diagram.

Yes tbh I would have thought no1 done properly is definitely the way forward - but I heard quite a lot saying a strategy similar to 2 is best - thx for feedback so far guys

 

[Baros]

#1 has been the way we've always done it however tiered linking a pbn is an option. Only problem when tiered linking a pbn is that you're basically linking pbn sites together and thats a big NONO, its not safe. I wouldn't consider #2 because I value my pbn.

 

[hootsparta]

Yes tbh I would have thought no1 done properly is definitely the way forward - but I heard quite a lot saying a strategy similar to 2 is best - thx for feedback so far guys

No problem. You are welcome.

After getting the results. Keep share on here. Upcoming link builders will be using it.

 

[davids355]

#1 best. I believe #2 would be overkill

 

[1morenoob]

number 1 is obviously stronger

 

[ThopHayt]

#1 is good, its pretty standard beginner thinking: spend most your money on T1 and then build T2 when and if you get the cash

#2 would make each T1 PBN more powerful (with fewer PBNs though) and you could do a more aggressive T3 campaign on it. Also you wouldn't have to use as expensive of content on the T2 PBN sites as the T1. If you have lots of cash and can build a lot of sites and DRIP THEM OUT then #2 is fine as well. Just beware building and then linking everything together too quickly.

An option #3 would be to build your own #1 and then buy some PBN links to aim at it to power it up.

-ThopHayt

 

[Cshark]

Number #1 looks solid, without doubt in terms of PBN. If you're building web 2.0 the second structure makes sense.

 

[djp371]

Number 1 indeed.

 

[Furious Man]

i suggest for first one

 

[ranjim]

#2 would make each T1 PBN more powerful (with fewer PBNs though) and you could do a more aggressive T3 campaign on it. Also you wouldn't have to use as expensive of content on the T2 PBN sites as the T1. If you have lots of cash and can build a lot of sites and DRIP THEM OUT then #2 is fine as well. Just beware building and then linking everything together too quickly.

Can the tier 2 PBNs be powered with GSA or do I have to use another tier to not damage the PBNs like a tier of Rankerx social network properties perhaps then GSA?

It would like like Tier 1 PBN> Tier 2 PBN> web 2.0/other PBNs/social signals>then GSA