Getting easy backlinks

[Riposte]

EDIT: just saw your reply. What's the use of an "indirect link", whatever that means? I want to gather link to my site, not to some random guy's blog

What do you think is better:

• A link from an unindexed site with pagerank 0
• A link from a page with pagerank 5

The answer is the second one. A link from a page with pagerank 5.

Now why do you think that is? Which one of those has more incoming links?

So why the hell would you only want links from shitty PR0 pages that probably aren't even indexed?

 

[bhpbhp]

Can we use this for non-English sites?

And have anyone seen any increases in rankings because of this?

 

[lesaurus]

I have been using this for two weeks now. What Would really make this a lot better is the following.

1 the ability to vary the destination URL. For instance I have a MFA site with roughly 10 pages. I would like to be able to write ONE article for submission and have it auto rotate through the ten page URL's. At the moment i would have to write 10 spinner articles which i really dont fancy doing it would take ages for me( not a MASSIVE problem but would be nice).

2 Have the ability to spin the anchor text. Gaining loads of backlinks with exactlly the same anchor text does not look good/natural which is what this program is trying to achieve.

I also use SEnuke and the article submission module allows both these features. Sadly SEnuke cant do what this does and schedule the submissions/bookmarks to make them more natural.

We need a combination of the two!

This does have potential though, the links are coming in slowly but surely from different accounts and it truly is set and forget.
If the two above features were implemented i would keep paying my money but as it stands i dont know how effective this will be. I might just be better off gaining a couple of high PR links instead?

 

[whs1978]

Have the ability to spin the anchor text. Gaining loads of backlinks with exactlly the same anchor text does not look good/natural which is what this program is trying to achieve.

Yes, you can spin the anchor text. I did and the blog postings pretty much all had different anchor texts from each other. You could always disable your campaign and resubmit with the spun version to get unique anchor texts.

 

[beav3336]

Using it and have good 40 links for last 5 days with 5 pages from site. Also have several links pointing to articles and squidoo. You get one month free, and I am sold. Hope everyone gives it a try. The more sign up, the more it helps all of us using this system.

 

[lesaurus]

Oh ok the anchor text thing is cool. Didn't realise that. I was thinking last night that
to get round the inability to vary the destination URL maybe you could just copy the spinnner text to another campaign and then change the URL. There
at be some dupe content then but it would stop you having to write new text for each one.

Someone said about "links to the links" these second tier links will actually be the social bookmarking links to the articles, not articles to articles. To do that I Spode you would just go into one of your reports, find one of your newly submitted articles and then set up a new campaign with that as the destination.

 

[xanubi]

Ok, after one week with the system, here it is my review:

PROS
1) generally, this tool is very good, and the linkwheel system is very good.

2) for one whitehat site I've, with this system, I jumped from page 2 on google to page 1, position 4!!

3) Link building speed is perfect for google, and it really works.

CONS
1) well, there's always cons. The system is limited to 50 campaigns (which means 50 sites), but only 20 links a day, which means that only 20 campaigns will receive 1 link each day. I understand this, because of system resources, but it's a no no for many blackhaters who build dozens of sites a day.

2) Review submissions. I think the system should review submissions and have some kind of filter to block bad submissions. For example, today I saw one submission that had a { missing, and the resulting submission was looking too SPAMMY:

"Read more:Trivani International|Trivani Products|Trivani Sponsor a Child|Trivani Scam?|Trivani Utah|Trivani Springville|Trivani|Trivani Com}"

it's obvious that this guy forgot the { and the system let it pass, it shouldn't.

That's it for now. This system is growing, new web 2.0 properties will be added, which means more links daily (not the 20 limit). I think for the future, this tool will be one of the best I'ver seen. For now, is quite good.

Classification: 3.8 (in 5)

Last note: People using this system, should build their campaigns carefully, please double check your texts for errors and typos!

 

[jnelson563]

I just wanna add, I've been using it for a week now.

Since I only use white hat for my clients, I'm a little worried at the link velocity, but I've adjusted that down to very low to compensate. For one of my clients websites, it went from #10 to #5 for a term that gets 90K searches a month, which I can safely attribute to this.

I like it, and will probably continue paying as long as it stays adult free and people continue using it properly.

 

[iwantmoney]

i have 33 links so far after a week of use, one campaign running.

 

[xanubi]

I just wanna add, I've been using it for a week now.

Since I only use white hat for my clients, I'm a little worried at the link velocity, but I've adjusted that down to very low to compensate. For one of my clients websites, it went from #10 to #5 for a term that gets 90K searches a month, which I can safely attribute to this.

I like it, and will probably continue paying as long as it stays adult free and people continue using it properly.

Totally agree with you jnelson. Like i said in my review, this is a very good tool, that with time will evolve to the best tool i'ver seen. Every dollar paid is worthy!

 

[hwolfpack6]

0 links after about 5 days :|

 

[googlemonster]

Yeah how long does it take to 'start rolling'? Waited a few days nothing so far...

 

[rockinrobin]

EDIT: just saw your reply. What's the use of an "indirect link", whatever that means? I want to gather link to my site, not to some random guy's blog

The "what's the use" question has answers all over the Internet where link building is explained, so I won't do it here. There's more than one way to build backlinks. The Link Juicer uses one. It is not the only one. It may not be the best one for you.

If all you want is direct bookmarks to your site then you are using the wrong tool. What The Link Juicer does is link to your site from a variety of web 2.0 properties not just bookmarks. Some are blogs. Then it bookmarks the blogs. The link juice passes from the bookmarks to the blogs to your site. This allows us to create far more links in the network without looking spammy. That's all. If you don't get it, then read up on the Halbertizer or Goolelizer methods.

I have been using this for two weeks now. What Would really make this a lot better is the following.

1 the ability to vary the destination URL.

This is planned and will be rolled out in a few days.

2 Have the ability to spin the anchor text. Gaining loads of backlinks with exactlly the same anchor text does not look good/natural which is what this program is trying to achieve.

You can do this, as I think another member has pointed this out.

Using it and have good 40 links for last 5 days with 5 pages from site. Also have several links pointing to articles and squidoo. You get one month free, and I am sold. Hope everyone gives it a try. The more sign up, the more it helps all of us using this system.

Thank you! So, please tell every one!

just go into one of your reports, find one of your newly submitted articles and then set up a new campaign with that as the destination.

One of the strategies laid out in the documentation is to run campaigns on your site but also on ezine articles for example that point to your site. With very little effort you can create quite a web of links.

1) well, there's always cons. The system is limited to 50 campaigns (which means 50 sites), but only 20 links a day, which means that only 20 campaigns will receive 1 link each day. I understand this, because of system resources, but it's a no no for many blackhaters who build dozens of sites a day.

Hopefully we will have more sites and as you rightly pointed out this will mean more links/day. There have been a few people requesting a mega-account where they could have more social media accounts and get more links. This is under consideration. The link velocity will always be limited to a moderate level for obvious reasons.

2) Review submissions. I think the system should review submissions and have some kind of filter to block bad submissions. For example, today I saw one submission that had a { missing, and the resulting submission was looking too SPAMMY:

it's obvious that this guy forgot the { and the system let it pass, it shouldn't.

This has been dealt with. All spun text is cleared of {}'s and all text following the first | is deleted. It may not look like the user wanted but it will eliminate the sort of thing you pointed out.

Thank you for your considered and balanced review.

0 links after about 5 days :|

Contact support.

Yeah how long does it take to 'start rolling'? Waited a few days nothing so far...

Typically, scheduling is run at 8PM GMT for the following day. If you save a campaign after that, it runs a day later. Since 8PM GMT is quite early in the US (3PM NY, noon LA) a lot of users in those time zones will save their work after the scheduler runs that day. So they save a campaign on Monday night, and links begin to appear only on Wednesday, and if they are unlucky their links show up *late* on Wednesday (it is totally random) so they wonder what's going on.

If it has been over 48 hours and you have NO links, then contact support. Only by looking at your campaign can we answer this type of question.

 

[pupster]

Originally Posted by nufaman View Post
What's the use of an "indirect link", whatever that means? I want to gather link to my site, not to some random guy's blog

This gives weight and muscle to the link that is pointing to your site by making sure that the link that is pointing directly to your site sits on a page that is indexed.

Make sense?

 

[googlemonster]

started working now...

 

[nj1485]

I have 42 links to my site over 5 days, I am happy.

While I can see where my links are posted I cant seem to find them on G**LE.
I use the link:http://................ operator but do not have any results. If I cant see the links
can the bots?
If anyone has any ideas as to hoe I can look up the links then much thanks.
(I used backlinkwatch.com also and no results, except the ones that I posted myself)

 

[pupster]

nj1485....use the link query that Yahoo provides as they will tell you all links that are actually showing....Google won't and never will.

http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=yourURL.com&bwm=i&bwmo=&bwmf=s

 

[nj1485]

Thanks pupster.
I tried your suggestion but no luck. I only show 3 links. This is what I am trying to find out.

I went to backlinkwatch .com and put in this domain,provenhemorrhoidtreatment.com. It came back with 42 backlinks,with anchor text for each link and url the backlink is on.It also tells me which domains are no/******** and PR.
When I do this with my domain I get nothing?????? I should show 40 plus links, according to linkjuice.

Who knows???

 

[nj1485]

I figured that.,links not indexed is the problem.

In order to ensure your link gets noticed, maybe once a new one is posted in linkjuice, go to the link and manually submit it to the search engines. This can also be automated of course. This way you ensure your post gets crawled but you have to do more work now. The idea of linkjuice is that you set the campaign and leave it alone.

Waiting for g o o g l e to index you wastes precious time.

 

[dizen]

I have network of content sites that took me years to built . Took a lot of time and effort , Is it completely safe to promote my sites using linkjuicer?. It is extremely important for me not to get banned by Adsense and Google bot ....I can cry out loud if that happens.

Many Thanks