Most people quote the root metrics when they talk metrics. This is a matter of some argument, however, because some quote it the other way and there is confusion sometimes. But usually when people just say "a post on a TF10..." they mean the root.
That is a tumblr blog .. The root domain (Tumblr) has a TF of 91 .. The actual blog you are looking at there, has a TF of 22
That is the case for all Web 2.0 platforms .. However, if you were analysing a regular website, the root domain would be the overall TF, and the URL would be the TF of that particular page
Not correct.
On domain, Root is domain.com, Subdomain is www.domain.com, URL is http://domain.com or http://www.domain.com
Good majority of sites uses www. version, so all links will be pointing to www.domain.com, not to domain.com which is Root. So you need to look for each domain differently.
But at the end, metrics are just for filtering. Take a look at a link profile instead.
Go for the url metrics, instead of root or subdomain as the latter 2 take into account the whole backlink profiles of all indexed pages of the root domain in question.
But if you want to choose the "right" metric for a Tumblr, go for the URL metrics. It's like "homepage" metrics.
Why? Because no matter which backlinks point to the subdomain, you can't reconstruct the old Tumblr URL structure, so you won't benefit of any of the other backlinks pointing to internal URLs. Sure, there are ways to redirect via Javascript old URLs to new ones, but too much hassle for a minor gain
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.