Rightly put. WordAI is definitely expensive than SC but when compared to the readable content, WordAI certainly has the edge. Its upto the person's budget and purpose he want to use itI haven't used either for a while but in my experience then it was always a case of SC being far more cost effective while WordAI gave more readable content. I would think that for most people their choice on which was "better" would be based on budget and/or the use of the content.
If the average user used 1 million words/mo with the Turing Spinner we would lose money. I think you greatly underestimate exactly how much computation is required for WordAi's Turing Spinner to make the calculations it does.It is not like their CPU costs warrant the limitations.
WordAI annoys me with its SaaS look and the pricing is quite outrageous. And the limits on the 'Turing method' are quite cheeky. IE, if I pay an arm and a leg for something, then please don't limit my options. It is not like their CPU costs warrant the limitations. The 250K words that you get for your 50 bucks per month, is a very shitty move by wordAI. I'd consider buying it (again) if I could get 1000K words for the same price.
Decent output though, but if you want to produce masses of content, there are other options available.