SERengines As Tier Ones on GSA?

[alexel]

I just started using SERengines for additional engines on GSA SER, and I like their web 2.0 submissions. So far I have gotten 6 PR5 Web 2.0 articles submitted in one run... With fresh private proxies of course.

Can I replace my manual 2.0 creations with additional engines from SERengines on GSA SER? Or is it not advised?


P.S. - if you have any suggestions on any other services similar to SERengines.com, please do suggest

 

[Bahmer]

Meh, most of the core GSA community isn't using SER engines anymore. Support sucks and like 2 sites work.

 

[alexel]

SERengines works great to me, do you have any suggestions for other engines?

 

[Keyser_Soze]

Ask on the forum, sorry can't post the link. Try to Google it.

 

[710fla]

RankerX is perfect for tier 1, has a ton of high PR sites not just web 2.0

TurboWeb is good too but can only do web 2.0 ($10 cheaper than RankerX)

 

[alexel]

Thanks, I'm going to try the two.

 

[bekemew]

+1 for RankerX. Their site-list: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...E9CWfDbj6Bg1drvGqV2RQ/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=0

 

[Furious Man]

Am also suggested the same thing that mean RankerX

 

[alexel]

I just fooled around with RankerX and I didn't check off somethings, so it kept running, and created MANY web 2.0's. How can I have these 2.0's automatically update articles on its own?

 

[Devil Rider]

What I recommended is RankerX it will be useful...

 

[vobpiedi]

I recommended that RankerX is best tool for Tier1

 

[arc323]

I just fooled around with RankerX and I didn't check off somethings, so it kept running, and created MANY web 2.0's. How can I have these 2.0's automatically update articles on its own?

You have to go to the "Private Network" section and import the accounts into a private network project. This will allow you to post to them again automatically. RankerX is very useful for this purpose.

 

[Bahmer]

Meh, RankerX is okay. Its lacking a lot of critical features. You cant specify how many times to use each URL and anchor text, so theres risk of duplicating anchors on T1s, as well, I loaded in a bunch of private blogs- it will fail on average 50% of the time when posting to them.

Overall, there are better options out there than RankerX. I will say It has a nice looking UI though. It's just not really that functional if you want a high degree of control. There's only like 12 article directories, about 6 places to post press releases, etc.

There are a lot of profile engines but I wouldn't dare use these as a t1.

Overall I wouldn't dare use RankerX directly to a money site- it must have a massive footprint as well.

 

[alexel]

Meh, RankerX is okay. Its lacking a lot of critical features. You cant specify how many times to use each URL and anchor text, so theres risk of duplicating anchors on T1s, as well, I loaded in a bunch of private blogs- it will fail on average 50% of the time when posting to them.

Overall, there are better options out there than RankerX. I will say It has a nice looking UI though. It's just not really that functional if you want a high degree of control. There's only like 12 article directories, about 6 places to post press releases, etc.

There are a lot of profile engines but I wouldn't dare use these as a t1.

Overall I wouldn't dare use RankerX directly to a money site- it must have a massive footprint as well.

Yea I gave it a try, I wasn't too happy with it. Do you use any specific programs for Tier 1's?

 

[Automated]

I heard SEREngines was working on a 2.0 version, but from what I am aware, it still isn't implemented yet.

I am with some of the others and would say RankerX is the way to go for now...

 

[MonkeyJohn]

Rankwyz offers tons of options for creating a nice Web 2.0 network....problem is it doesnt support that many sites and its success rate at posting is crap!

I would say RankerX is the opposite. I have created a lot of Web 2.0 properties very quickly but it takes a bit more effort to build them out.

 

[alexel]

Rankwyz offers tons of options for creating a nice Web 2.0 network....problem is it doesnt support that many sites and its success rate at posting is crap!

I would say RankerX is the opposite. I have created a lot of Web 2.0 properties very quickly but it takes a bit more effort to build them out.

I agree with you.

 

[christianbed]

Surprised no mentions of FCS Networker...might want to give it a go...I had a bunch of web 2.0's made here a couple years ago, uploaded them to FCS, and then just managed them all from one dashboard.

 

[alexel]

Surprised no mentions of FCS Networker...might want to give it a go...I had a bunch of web 2.0's made here a couple years ago, uploaded them to FCS, and then just managed them all from one dashboard.

Thats exactly what I was looking for! I was hoping someone can refer me to a prgram that does this, thanks!

 

[MonkeyJohn]

Thats exactly what I was looking for! I was hoping someone can refer me to a prgram that does this, thanks!

Check out Pavel's Rankwyz videos on YouTube. Makes Rankwyz look like the Mutt's Nuts...problem is (I have found) it doesn't work great in practice. And you have to buy or add your own accounts.

FCS...not updated for a while but quite solid. Has a seperate account creator.

With FCS/Rankwyz you have to test which accounts it can post to snd then buiild your network around these. RankerX is a beast though...it creates and posts to much more sites.