Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread
- Thread starter Ryabinchik
- Start date
- Status
powlow29
Supreme Member
- Nov 18, 2009
- 1,352
- 1,223
Still no reply ?
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Thanks for your order!
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Thanks, your order received.
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Report sent to es*****[email protected].
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Report sent to li******[email protected].
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Report sent to te****[email protected].
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Reports sent to:
ed*********[email protected]
pl*******[email protected]
we*********[email protected]
ed*********[email protected]
pl*******[email protected]
we*********[email protected]
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Report sent to jg********[email protected].
Very disappointed with this service.
The turnaround time was about a full month. The seller didn't bother to reach out to me, and I may not have received anything if I hadn't chased him down.
The quality of the Web 2.0s is very disappointing. Someone complained earlier about spun word user names, and this is still an issue. Most have numbers as well. The seller failed to remove any of the default content, so I'm left with titles like "Company Name" and about pages with lorem ipsum text. I have stuff built with FCS / RankerX that I've never manually touched that's more likely to pass manual review.
Platform choice is also very poor. Stuff like Shutterfly that never indexes. My guess is that out of the ten Web 2.0s delievered, maybe 7-8 will end up indexing.
On the plus side, the quality of the content is reasonable.
I've bought quite a few Web 2.0 packages on bhw and elsewhere, and this is by far the worst value.
The turnaround time was about a full month. The seller didn't bother to reach out to me, and I may not have received anything if I hadn't chased him down.
The quality of the Web 2.0s is very disappointing. Someone complained earlier about spun word user names, and this is still an issue. Most have numbers as well. The seller failed to remove any of the default content, so I'm left with titles like "Company Name" and about pages with lorem ipsum text. I have stuff built with FCS / RankerX that I've never manually touched that's more likely to pass manual review.
Platform choice is also very poor. Stuff like Shutterfly that never indexes. My guess is that out of the ten Web 2.0s delievered, maybe 7-8 will end up indexing.
On the plus side, the quality of the content is reasonable.
I've bought quite a few Web 2.0 packages on bhw and elsewhere, and this is by far the worst value.
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Thanks for your review. I am sorry about long processing, I have some delays in delivering reports these days. As for another part, I do not offer customizing of web 2.0s, and also I do not guarantee all do-follow properties. But you can always ask for any custom requests while ordering (like only do-follow web 2.0s etc), I am open for it.
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Report sent to xo******[email protected].
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Report sent to ma********[email protected].
fullwall3t
BANNED
- Apr 22, 2015
- 2,141
- 431
Can i get a review copy?
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Report sent to be*******[email protected].
Ryabinchik
Elite Member
- Jan 4, 2010
- 2,563
- 147
Report sent to sa****s@sm*****st.net.
- Status