My SUPER Web 2.0 Plan

[Sprechend]

Is a lot work , but if this works ,worth it .

 

[Univa]

Nice Plan,
I have a few questions for you related to backlink building to super web 2.0
> What kind of blogs you pick for commenting? Related to your keywords + AA or something else?
> Also those contextual links they might come from single paged web 2.0 or you have some other sources in mind?

Cheers

 

[bekemew]

Perfect plan

Besides that, you should use Web 2.0 by RankerX. I building Web 2.0 Network and Web 2.0 Profile for my project. It works is fine for me. This is a list of major active social networking on RankerX. It's here

I hope this could help you. good luck!

 

[toxic08]

Wow, I was searching for this. I already saw t0mmy's post and yours. This makes me want to try one.

Do web 2.0 works in small scale? I really want to try one but with 4-5 sites first. Worth it?

 

[patriotnews]

Nice Plan,
I have a few questions for you related to backlink building to super web 2.0
> What kind of blogs you pick for commenting? Related to your keywords + AA or something else?
> Also those contextual links they might come from single paged web 2.0 or you have some other sources in mind?

Cheers

I pay people here and on Fiverr to blast GSA SER blog comments.
For contextual, same deal, I just have the blasted out from GSA SER, or SEOmni here, or some other good sale thread.
I don't invest too much into the backlinks coming from commenting, or contextual, it is more so Google just finds my links everywhere.

 

[patriotnews]

Wow, I was searching for this. I already saw t0mmy's post and yours. This makes me want to try one.

Do web 2.0 works in small scale? I really want to try one but with 4-5 sites first. Worth it?

I can be, if you keyword is low comp, just build up their power first, do the shares and such. A couple strong ones can help a low comp keyword.

 

[Aatrox]

You really have a master plan, it's a bit an overkill, but it should work great.

 

[Floopa75]

I think I'd rather just build the normal 10 web 2.0s per pillar article, hit them with tier 2 and 3 blasts, and then clean it up with a couple high quality PBN links

 

[JProckerzon]

Many people like but many dislike your plan. But I think it'll be beneficial for you for any point of view. If you want to sell it so, it'll be very expensive and profitable. Keep us update if any addition or change occur. I'm interested in your idea.

 

[patriotnews]

Many people like but many dislike your plan. But I think it'll be beneficial for you for any point of view. If you want to sell it so, it'll be very expensive and profitable. Keep us update if any addition or change occur. I'm interested in your idea.

Thanks. I will. Figured I am only out a bit of money and time, but you'll never know if you don't try.

 

[dearviola]

It's really a detailed plan worth to try! OP please keep update your journey from time to time to let's see the pay off! Good luck!

 

[remboka]

A bit out of topic here.
I use your weebly sample above to do the check.
From the screenshot below, do you thing such property will be counted by google as a link?
The property is indexed, but the robot.txt block the description.
I saw same thing on a new jimdo.com property.



Edit: Found same thing on my 1 page edublogs property. Will the link placed on such property get counted?
I used to think that if it is indexed then it's okay, but I'm not really sure now.

 

[transitarea]

1. How many web 2.0 sites are you going to make?
2. Do you use different proxy for each property ?
3. Do you use different email address for each property?

 

[patriotnews]

A bit out of topic here.
I use your weebly sample above to do the check.
From the screenshot below, do you thing such property will be counted by google as a link?
The property is indexed, but the robot.txt block the description.
I saw same thing on a new jimdo.com property.

View attachment 76647

Edit: Found same thing on my 1 page edublogs property. Will the link placed on such property get counted?
I used to think that if it is indexed then it's okay, but I'm not really sure now.
View attachment 76649

Have you tried using one as a backlink?
I have a Weebly with the "no-index" claim, that I blasted the crap out of with links, and it shows in GWMT as a backlink.
Never know unless you try.

 

[patriotnews]

1. How many web 2.0 sites are you going to make?
2. Do you use different proxy for each property ?
3. Do you use different email address for each property?

1) in original post; please read.
2) in original post; please read
3) in original post; please read

Hope I helped you out!

 

[ttmschine]

A bit out of topic here.
I use your weebly sample above to do the check.
From the screenshot below, do you thing such property will be counted by google as a link?
The property is indexed, but the robot.txt block the description.
I saw same thing on a new jimdo.com property.

View attachment 76647

Edit: Found same thing on my 1 page edublogs property. Will the link placed on such property get counted?
I used to think that if it is indexed then it's okay, but I'm not really sure now.
View attachment 76649

With regards to edublogs - looks like a great web 2.0, and you can pay (c.$40) so that you can remove the noindex - anyone have any experience with that particular site - is it worth paying?

Does it rank?

 

[jaagolol]

Good luck, the plan looks well laid out.

 

[Velenterprise]

Great plan! Will take a lot of work to execute this but I think it will be worth it in the long run.

 

[pressrelease]

Its a great plan but it will require a lot of time
May be 6 month to completely setup each thing

 

[patriotnews]

Its a great plan but it will require a lot of time
May be 6 month to completely setup each thing

You about hit my timeline on the head, I aimed for 3 months of pre-building web 2.0s and setting up expired ones, plus that gives me time for all the site content to be pre-built, then once launched another 5 months of slow builds, good call on the timeline.