Permanently Closed Marketplace Sales Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
UPDATE

Site already ranking for 160 keywords. Just started using latest update, It searches content through search engine, also added captcha.

I have 400 long tail keywords and it already created 23 Articles under 30 min. If we compare to article directories, it didn't worked so well with longtail keywords.

Long tails works now like a charm with captcha and search engine as a source!

I will update when there will be posted 10k articles. :)


Yes, I admit, search engines mode is really good after the latest updates. Now you can post articles for pretty much any keyword, even the most "longtail" one, which makes this tool rock for niche sites!
 
Waiting for the promotion time for two weeks! Click the purchase button to the lifetime license just now :):):) Will be back with review.
 
im here on the trial and looking have run a few tests. it looks good though i cant use this for my money site... is there any settings i need to change to get the content more accurately on topic. TIA
 
im here on the trial and looking have run a few tests. it looks good though i cant use this for my money site... is there any settings i need to change to get the content more accurately on topic. TIA

I'm actually using it for my money sites. For sites with a lot of daily readers I'm just saving as draft and proofreading. For affiliate commission focused websites I'm just publishing on autopilot and it works just fine.
 
I have been following this thread from the beginning. Read lots of decent reviews and surprised.... if right now there exists so good tool that has been doing such a wonderful job, even surpassing wordai!!I was really skeptical. I so gave a 5 days trial. And here is my experience.

At the very fast spun by "super quality," setting surprised me with its readability. I watch some sentences those were not in that articles. Those were added by multiblogger (MB) automatically in paragraphs and were so well written that they fit unbeatably without disturbing the flow of the write up. This makes the readability much different from the original. It's a wonderful function.

Later, I tested its different spinning settings from "super quality " to "super unique" and with different combination of sentence shuffling and paragraph level spinning. Compared different outputs with the original articles and even with spinrewriter ( have been using spinrewriter for two years).

To me, it is so far a very good tool for auto article rewriting and easily does better job than spinrewriter. Readability a bit compromised with spelling errors. A bit edit is mandatory to make it human readable and for use for T1 as well as for money site. For the first article ( mentioned above), percentage of uniqueness for both spinrewrite and multiblogger were exactly similar ... 32% with best readable setting, when compared to the original content. Online scan for uniqueness with plagiarism checker was 80 for MB and 71% for spinrewriter. When both spun were compared side by site shows 48% uniqueness.

In general, for "super quality" spun by MB uniqueness lies around ~ 30% in jet checker, and that rise nearly 50 max for "super unique" setting. Most of them pass copyscape. Not waited much to check the indexing rate. Even in plagiarism checker setting to check the spun version in Google most of them lie above 70% uniqueness.

To me the "compromised" setting is best to get a readable and unique spun article. Sentence shuffling is OK but paragraph spinning is not much good. Both require much improvement. This tool is in developmental stage, and its frequent updates are the evidence that developer has been working hard. I am sanguine it will be much more perfect soon. The factor that is pain to me is its cost. I wish to purchase a lifetime license, but the cost is out of my reach. My humble request to the developer to make less costly only an LSI spinner version. If, any day, that comes, in reality, I will be first one to purchase that. My best wishes. (At last, I am sorry for my English; I am not a native English speaker.)
 
.

Only 24h left:


It's "Lunar Year" Promotion time!


20% OFF of Monthly Subscription
40% OFF of Lifetime License!

Special Offer expires in 7 days!


Click Here to grab your copy!


PS. Lifetime license is only $199 instead of $349

:)
 
Just ordered Transaction ID: 2SE16460NN4572713, please activate
 
.

Only 2h left:


It's "Lunar Year" Promotion time!


20% OFF of Monthly Subscription
40% OFF of Lifetime License


Click Here to grab your Lifetime License for $199 Only (instead of $349)!


:)
 
Guys

What feature is more useful in your opinion, RSS scraper or Sitemap.xml scraper?
 
I will certainly use the trial and come back to leave a review :)
 
Same issue as above.
When ordering it states: Charges 4.99$ for first 5 days - the 49.99 for each 30 days
 
Guys

What feature is more useful in your opinion, RSS scraper or Sitemap.xml scraper?

Sounds like a Sitemap.xml scraper will grab information of the sites in a wider scale and an RSS scraper would focus more on Articles? Both will be helpful and interesting. :D In my opinion, maybe I'd like to have Sitemap.xml scraper first.

Thank you for OP's hard work!
 
I've changed the trial price to $4.99 in order to filter out trial abuse.
 
Hey guys

I'm launching another promotion:

20 Lifetime Licenses for $199.99 (instead of $349.99)

Click Here

Enjoy!
 
Good luck for sale!!

One question OP. Under the mode of scraping webpages, we have to fill the table with the exact urls of the page? or is there any way for the script to crawl the domain and get the articles relevant to the keywords or some similar function? I don't have the delusion it is able to crawl the whole tumblr or weebly domains...:) Of course that'll be perfect btw!

Because, if it works as the former way, the user needs to do the research and find out the page which publish the article he wants. If the user does so, why not he just copy and paste the article manually to a txt file? And if he get a long page list, maybe scraped from other software, I think he still need to check them one by one to see whether they have the content he wants?

I haven't tried this function because Multiblogger runs quite slowly on my PC. I guess it's my PC's problem. I'm going to move the work onto a VPS soon. So waiting for your answer and hope Multiblogger would be improved frequently and more powerful!
 
Should you be using hundreds of keywords for each site. I ran a txt output with just the keyword plumbing and it came back with nothing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top