get to google #1 in 5 mins. WORKING. but for how long?
- Thread starter ddh213
- Start date
TheKingGeek
BANNED
- Mar 24, 2011
- 1,078
- 1,120
Bro please delete this post. This will kill the method real fast when leecher and noobs start sharing on other forums for some reps and thanks.
topmm
Regular Member
- Jul 29, 2014
- 230
- 85
It's already shared in a few places...
ouchthathurts
Power Member
- Feb 16, 2011
- 622
- 812
Of course it works, both terms receive 0 monthly searches
Last edited:
braindebug
Junior Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 183
- 133
I am just curious, ALL of you asking to delete the thread knew the method? Or just now that you know it you want to keep for yourself?
D
Deleted member 719276
Guest
2nd one .
ChanzGrande
Elite Member
- Feb 16, 2008
- 2,482
- 1,221
I love it when a 5 minute method takes 12 minutes to explain. These search queries have nobody looking for them, and thus they have nobody ranking for them. Essentially this method can work for all super low lying fruit, but is unlikely to work for say "Payday Loans UK." It is unlikely to be patched soon in my opinion because despite how easy it is ... a very small number of people overall are going to pursue it.
Now I do wonder if this used in conjunction with some other strategies might strengthen it overall, and start to be able to reach for some more competitive keywords, but ... Big G is watching, so I doubt it would work much better in any other SEO configuration or combined strategy. More likely it would just out a footprint or point light in a direction nobody wants for their sites.
There's no need to hide this away. While it can work on some things, it's simply unlikely to change the world soon despite being an easy way to rank for terms that there are 1,000 other easy ways to rank for. For example, you could simply create a video on youtube for ANY term that has no search data and no competitors targeting it, and simply indexing it would get you #1. I think there's a reason not too many people try to rank for this low lying fruit, and that's because it's not all that tasty the way scarfing down a handful of "nevada divorce attorneys" would be.
It works though as OP illustrated, so I'm sure some smart folks can come up with a viable usage scenario. For example, is this the mechanism through which folks in the movie niche get their sub-reddits indexed so quickly? Is it necessary in this scenario to keyword stuff the actual content posted on the sub-reddit? Ref: https://www.reddit.com/r/latoki/.rss <-- Any link to the sub without a DOT qualifier at the end will always simply show a clickable link but with the .rss qualifier we can see what the poster has stuffed into the content of the post itself.
These people use a custom .css entry to make the image clickable. I'm sure you can find that if you look around hard enough, or you can simply de-compile it from research. It's nothing earth shattering. The question though is really ultimately one of .... can this work with more competitive keywords using a keyword stuffing approach on reddit, or is this simply a function of the type of niche this is?
Good post OP!
Now I do wonder if this used in conjunction with some other strategies might strengthen it overall, and start to be able to reach for some more competitive keywords, but ... Big G is watching, so I doubt it would work much better in any other SEO configuration or combined strategy. More likely it would just out a footprint or point light in a direction nobody wants for their sites.
There's no need to hide this away. While it can work on some things, it's simply unlikely to change the world soon despite being an easy way to rank for terms that there are 1,000 other easy ways to rank for. For example, you could simply create a video on youtube for ANY term that has no search data and no competitors targeting it, and simply indexing it would get you #1. I think there's a reason not too many people try to rank for this low lying fruit, and that's because it's not all that tasty the way scarfing down a handful of "nevada divorce attorneys" would be.
It works though as OP illustrated, so I'm sure some smart folks can come up with a viable usage scenario. For example, is this the mechanism through which folks in the movie niche get their sub-reddits indexed so quickly? Is it necessary in this scenario to keyword stuff the actual content posted on the sub-reddit? Ref: https://www.reddit.com/r/latoki/.rss <-- Any link to the sub without a DOT qualifier at the end will always simply show a clickable link but with the .rss qualifier we can see what the poster has stuffed into the content of the post itself.
These people use a custom .css entry to make the image clickable. I'm sure you can find that if you look around hard enough, or you can simply de-compile it from research. It's nothing earth shattering. The question though is really ultimately one of .... can this work with more competitive keywords using a keyword stuffing approach on reddit, or is this simply a function of the type of niche this is?
Good post OP!
Last edited:
Wilson Grant Fisk
Elite Member
- Nov 10, 2012
- 15,677
- 46,840
Didn't even watch it but I am sharing it as I type.
iulianalex
Power Member
- Mar 13, 2014
- 635
- 162
This method is very saturated...and work only with very low competion kw
D
Deleted member 719276
Guest
CCCP PROPAGANDA !!! Reported.
Wilson Grant Fisk
Elite Member
- Nov 10, 2012
- 15,677
- 46,840
Hey Noobs, try these too:
https://medium.com/@abe_storey/5-minutes-to-page-1-of-google-f1635bda0e58#.5r2aqpbs3
https://www.reddit.com/r/Entreprene...o_rank_on_1_on_google_in_5_minutes_legit_seo/
http://www.jvfocus.com/threads/5-mi...tch-me-hit-page-1-in-minutes-free-video.1441/
I like the fact people think that some big secret is being shared. Very amusing.
https://medium.com/@abe_storey/5-minutes-to-page-1-of-google-f1635bda0e58#.5r2aqpbs3
https://www.reddit.com/r/Entreprene...o_rank_on_1_on_google_in_5_minutes_legit_seo/
http://www.jvfocus.com/threads/5-mi...tch-me-hit-page-1-in-minutes-free-video.1441/
I like the fact people think that some big secret is being shared. Very amusing.
Albeit you may not rank any decent terms with this, at least those starting off can earn a couple of $ here and there - especially those who complain about having just a few bucks.
I don't see a problem with that.
TheKingGeek
BANNED
- Mar 24, 2011
- 1,078
- 1,120
OMg bro please stop sharing this gems! Are you insane brah!?? Are you?
Op please delete this right now! Someone please close the whole forum down omg my methods are leaks because of noobs like W130SN that spent the whole day playing Sherlock Homes omg omg
Jokes aside, what is the biggest term that you had rank using this OP? I will give a proper try we a real keyword and see how it goes. Will post results.
Last edited:
asap1
BANNED
- Mar 25, 2013
- 4,956
- 3,262
I actually didn't even watch the video I just know stuff like this shouldnt be shared in the open.
I learned the hard way with my Yahoo Contributor method.
It will get abused to the point where google or whoever will have to step in and fix it.
And for people saying the method does not work you are wrong.
I've seen this in some 50k+ monthly search keywords. It does not hit #1 all the time but it does rank very high in a short amount of time.
Last edited: