I don't agree that SEO is dead till 2009. It's working good now too. And the importance of it is same.
I guess it relies on bounce rate and page views per visitor as much as 20%
its the only way to judge the quality. Sure it can have backlinks from bbc, good interlinking and silo strucurre and a 3k words article but bounce rate and pageviews still play a decent % of role in ranking. You can lower the bounce rate applying mby 1-2 random hours a day a plugin from a bhw member called smth like kill bounce rate
And I stopped reading after that...
Twice of that sh!t is already 2 times too much for me...![]()
Unfortunately, there are no bot can simulate chrome.
Because bot can not send message to google headquarter.
Because bot do not know google key to code and decode message for transmission.
It's time to wave your white flag to my child!!!
I agree... SEO works! and we have plenty to deviance to support its effectiveness
OP,
I will give you $100 if you record a video of you blind folded trying to run across a highway/motorway and post it on here.
I guess it relies on bounce rate and page views per visitor as much as 20%
its the only way to judge the quality. Sure it can have backlinks from bbc, good interlinking and silo strucurre and a 3k words article but bounce rate and pageviews still play a decent % of role in ranking. You can lower the bounce rate applying mby 1-2 random hours a day a plugin from a bhw member called smth like kill bounce rate
I dont believe seo is dead. I personally have been using it and my associates also use it and have never complained anyday. yes some of your information might be true but will need more time to check on the facts from some one who has first hand experience. but i will support that they dont only depend on seo to rank, they will check on the bounce rate as you have indicated. thanks for the info though