Sape & Buffer

[maxchen]

I saw before people selling SAPE services at BHW, now is more and more rare(the amount of sape providers)

What some of them did is

Pumping SAPE links > Buffer > Money Site

Did anyone do this and get penalise by Google?
I was thinking it could work out, but might like to hear some insights from the experts here.

 

[SEO Controller]

Pumping SAPE links > Buffer > Money Site
Its much safer to get power from sapes and contact tommy, he is expert in playing with sapes.

 

[ThopHayt]

Isn't sape>URL-Shortener>Buffer>Site a safer route?

 

[maxchen]

Isn't sape>URL-Shortener>Buffer>Site a safer route?

Great idea . But which url shorterner? Bit.ly or goo.gl

 

[moonshine7000]

Nothing is 100% safe.You do that because it is easier to remove the links by the deleting the buffer.

 

[fc-dh]

I do it like this now Sape>>>expired domain with TF 20+ (on a different hosting then your targeted moneysite) --- Moneysite, so you hold all control and link juice instead of using it to a third party be it a shorter or web2.0 propperty

 

[illfounded21]

I do it like this now Sape>>>expired domain with TF 20+ (on a different hosting then your targeted moneysite) --- Moneysite, so you hold all control and link juice instead of using it to a third party be it a shorter or web2.0 propperty

Do you get good results this way? How long does it take to power up that expired domain?

 

[Faith]

I do it like this now Sape>>>expired domain with TF 20+ (on a different hosting then your targeted moneysite) --- Moneysite, so you hold all control and link juice instead of using it to a third party be it a shorter or web2.0 propperty

Will this be effective in the long run (6 months to 1 year)?

 

[asap1]

I do it like this now Sape>>>expired domain with TF 20+ (on a different hosting then your targeted moneysite) --- Moneysite, so you hold all control and link juice instead of using it to a third party be it a shorter or web2.0 propperty

I know a few people who do this and it works great, the only problem is its not really a buffer since the domain is being 301'ed to your money site so it will most likely be penalized along with the 301'ed domain

Do you get good results this way? How long does it take to power up that expired domain?

This method works great, its just like any other domain 301 just with the extra power of the sape links.

Will this be effective in the long run (6 months to 1 year)?

Yes, if you don't get penalized or remove the 301.

 

[fc-dh]

I know a few people who do this and it works great, the only problem is its not really a buffer since the domain is being 301'ed to your money site so it will most likely be penalized along with the 301'ed domain

Never had any problems with the switchboard method to be honest, and you could say the same of url shorteners, the only way to buffer it is to build a site on the expired domain and link it back to your moneysite, but that means lots of juice lost. I'll stick with this for as long as it works lol

 

[dronez]

The farther away you go with sape from directly pointing to your money site, the safer it could be deemed, which unfortunately also means the longer it may take to see results.

 

[freedomcoach]

I am using expired tumblrs as the tier 1 buffer for the sapes and it seems to work better than some of the other 2.0s for some reason

 

[macdonjo3]

Great idea . But which url shorterner? Bit.ly or goo.gl

Throw t*nyurl.com in there. Diversify. Isn't goo.gl owned by Google? lol

 

[ThopHayt]

Agreed, there are a TON of shorteners. Use a mix.

However I still for the record am against sape for any longterm money project.