PPV vs. FB ads vs. SEO

[seoactive]

I am new to affiliate marketing and came across many methods and ways to generate traffic.

Out of all, it seems like PPV is the easiest and quickest. The only drawback is the huge upfront investment needed.

The other one is facebook, but i think they are very strict on the content allowed on there.

And of course, SEO would be the best - but it takes a long time with high level of uncertainty.

What you guys think? Any inputs?

 

[smartboyhere]

SEO wont take much long time, as a newbie try with free methods (SEO).

 

[Cryogenesis]

Whatever method there is,seems like you're giving yourself excuses and putting it off.
You need to latch onto a method and test it before you give up or decide to move on. Welcome to affiliate marketing mate!

 

[Michelle Goodbrand]

I agree that PPV is the quick and simple way with the associated cost being the deterrent. Facebook is very content restrictive and therefore I'm not a huge fan. If time and effort are not critical factors then SEO tops the list as it pays the best dividends.

 

[seoactive]

I agree that PPV is the quick and simple way with the associated cost being the deterrent. Facebook is very content restrictive and therefore I'm not a huge fan. If time and effort are not critical factors then SEO tops the list as it pays the best dividends

Actually come to think of it, PPV might not be that much more expensive than SEO, considering all the time and efforts building a site, backlinks, content etc.

 

[clevelandslim]

I agree. SEO takes the time and efforts of building content and backlinks. But it gave a great result.

 

[Euphorix]

Fantastic affiliate marketing course: Chris Records $8k/Day