What SEO really works in Spring 2015?

[trkah]

Hey guys I just wanted to gather some ideas from some of you guys all in one forum. I want to know what you guys think works and doesn't work in Spring 2015.

For my 30 Day site so far I have bought

• high pr backlink service(which has always worked well),
• high pr blog comments for diversity(not sure what this does if anything now),
• drip feeding social signals through out every month(I know this helped a bit with SERP but not a lot, its still important and adds diversity)
• 30 Manual Social Bookmarks(just some diversity)
• 5 Web 2.0s drip feed for next 30 days, I then plan on buying 150 blog posts and pointing those at the 2.0s for some extra juice (Click Here)

What do you guys think about these services in particular for my 30 day site? And in general what do you believe are services worth buying and investing into in Summer 2015? I am already seeing results from my services but I want to maximize my SERPs and also keep from being penalized.

Hope to see some of your guys opinions!

 

[asap1]

Everything you said above is good but don't buy any "high PR" backlinks and maybe try 10-15 web 2.0s

High PR blog comments are a different story because that PAGE has pr and it usually keeps the links it has and from my experience most high PR comment link are 20+ TF which is good.

To replace your high pr backlinks I would look for homepage 20+ TF links, idc if the PR is n/a. (I would recommend you build your own PBN tho)

 

[trkah]

Everything you said above is good but don't buy any "high PR" backlinks and maybe try 10-15 web 2.0s

High PR blog comments are a different story because that PAGE has pr and it usually keeps the links it has and from my experience most high PR comment link are 20+ TF which is good.

To replace your high pr backlinks I would look for homepage 20+ TF links, idc if the PR is n/a. (I would recommend you build your own PBN tho)

Why do you say not to buy HIGH PR Backlinks? services like speed rank revolution, and red square seo has done wonders for others, also would you say its a must to build a PBN? Is it not easier to just buy PBN posts? thank you for your knowledge.

 

[ThopHayt]

Its way easier to buy than build. And while when you build yourself you have complete control and can keep quality high buying is just plain quicker. The only problem is that many sellers of PBN links sell crap. You'll find that your article is often either spun garbage or partially plagiarized. You'll also often see non-English sites on them, and disreputable niches like vaporizer cigarettes and sometimes even pharma. So if you buy PBN links ask for samples and make sure the articles they use are good quality and unique. Also be sure that YOU use diverse anchor text. I'd recommend using a unique anchor phrase for every single post.

 

[Lermontov]

PBN is still working.

 

[starki]

If we talk about SEO in 2015, we should talk about content first. Sure, links are still extremely important, but you can't rank stupid low-quality 300 word articles any more, no matter how many authority links you throw on them. Most sites don't fail because their links suck, but because their content sucks.

 

[trkah]

When you say diverse anchor text you mean the text that links to your site right?

how diverse do you recommend? for example if my targeted keyword is "free internet points" how diverse should the anchor text be? and thank you

 

[asap1]

Why do you say not to buy HIGH PR Backlinks? services like speed rank revolution, and red square seo has done wonders for others, also would you say its a must to build a PBN? Is it not easier to just buy PBN posts? thank you for your knowledge.

Even with those high pr sape links I would not buy them. You can go direct to sape and get them for 75% of what they charge. Each one of them links cost 0.05 - 0.20 in sape and they charge 0.80+ lol

I use SAPE and I buy 20+ TF links for 0.80 and less, you can even find super strong 40+ TF links for $2 - $3.

And building your own PBN will save you money in the long run. If you want 10 good PBN links that will cost $200+.

Building you own PBN will save you money.

 

[jo080711]

I agree with what was said above. I would also add to make sure your on-page is solid too.

 

[ThopHayt]

When you say diverse anchor text you mean the text that links to your site right?

how diverse do you recommend? for example if my targeted keyword is "free internet points" how diverse should the anchor text be? and thank you

By diverse I mean also words other than those. LSI, related terms, raw URL, site name, etc, etc.

 

[hanssolo]

Top SEO practice that work well:

On-site (excl linking)
1) Good content
2) Thinking about the user (including user experience)
3) Social Interaction
4) Mobile Friendly

Off-page
1) PBNs (blog networks work)
2) Web 2.0s
3) Social links
4) Viral links

If you don't do on-site stuff, you'll spend 10x more on links and get less results. Google is smart now and knows high quality sites.

 

[accelerator_dd]

It's not 2009, types of links (article dirs/link directories etc) don't stop working now, how you use them is another story.

Instead of asking to get a step-by-step ( which you never will, many have tried before you), grabbing a subscription from ahrefs/majestc, finding some affiliate sites already making money (just use some buying KWs) and trying to figure out how they are ranked would get you some answers.

 

[Wilson Grant Fisk]

Somebody told me that SEO is dead, now I am confused.

 

[hanssolo]

Somebody told me that SEO is dead, now I am confused.

lol that's classic too many guys are saying SEO is dead and then it comes back right.

 

[RuthSam]

Great and high quality content
Web 2.0
High Authority links

Thats working for me better then ever before.... I start loving BH and the BHW community... it's working if you try hard enough

 

[fc-dh]

If we talk about SEO in 2015, we should talk about content first. Sure, links are still extremely important, but you can't rank stupid low-quality 300 word articles any more, no matter how many authority links you throw on them. Most sites don't fail because their links suck, but because their content sucks.

Please go away with your content is king bullshit, i hear this mantra does very well over at WF.

HQ Content does NOTHING for your SEO, i will dare your to show me your best site rankings with your best content and i'll bet a $1000- that i will outrank your site within 4/8 weeks with nothing but spun/translated garbage content, wanna take that bet?

 

[trkah]

Even with those high pr sape links I would not buy them. You can go direct to sape and get them for 75% of what they charge. Each one of them links cost 0.05 - 0.20 in sape and they charge 0.80+ lol

I use SAPE and I buy 20+ TF links for 0.80 and less, you can even find super strong 40+ TF links for $2 - $3.

And building your own PBN will save you money in the long run. If you want 10 good PBN links that will cost $200+.

Building you own PBN will save you money.

Okay thank you for the great info!

By diverse I mean also words other than those. LSI, related terms, raw URL, site name, etc, etc.

Okay I see, it can even be unrelated terms, as long as it is diversifying your anchor text

 

[KardoseR]

the one that ranks your site